evelyn_b: (Default)
It's a week with a Wednesday in it, if not actually Wednesday anymore, and I'm still short on time. Not so short that I can't post my list of books read in 2019, though.

2019 was a banner year because I came to the end of Anthony Burgess' list in 99 Novels: The Best in English Since 1939. I really can't recommend this list highly enough if you want a reading challenge that is seriously challenging and full of weird and wonderful surprises. Burgess and I don't always agree on what we want out of a book, but he knows what he's doing and he's enough of an oddball to be interesting. It's not a one-year reading list unless you are way less easily distracted than me and have a lot of free time. It took me five years, but I was reading a lot of other things, too.

a list follows )

Goals for 2020: read more of the books I already own, double back and find some of the recs I've been "meaning to check out" for the past 5-10 years, finish Sue Grafton's Alphabet of Destruction series, support local booksellers (but not too much). If I keep all my resolutions, the number of books read next year should shrink a little as I try to shift a little more time to other hobbies. But that part is highly aspirational, so who knows?
evelyn_b: (Default)
It's the first of the year! If I'd planned ahead, I could have made this Reading Wednesday do double duty as a review of 2019, but I didn't, so all that will have to wait.

What I've Finished Reading

Ancient Evenings is too batshit not to get its own entry, but I am happy to say that I finished it, and consequently all 99 Novels, by the end of 2019. To celebrate, I read You've Had Your Time, the second memoir by Anthony Burgess - who is a little grumpier and about twenty years older than I thought he was. He's also a composer! When I opened up the book and saw that detail in his "about the author," I immediately thought, "This explains so much!" It probably doesn't explain all that much, but it harmonizes nicely with what he's willing to put up with in books. He's also more Catholic that I thought, though I shouldn't be surprised given how much page space he gives to his fellow Catholic misanthropes. All his descriptions of his own books make them sound like parodies of books by an author who doesn't completely get "litfic." While visiting my parents I also read The Novel Now, a much earlier book about novels Anthony Burgess likes.

What I'm Reading Now

The title of Great True Spy Stories isn't lying about it being full of great spy stories. This is actually an anthology, edited by Alan Dulles, a RL spy guy from the CIA who occasionally appears as a character. The stories are largely mid-20th century magazine prose, with predictable levels of partisanship and stuffiness, but you couldn't ask for better plots. My favorite is still the very first story in the collection, about a French guy who stole a map from the Nazis while putting up wallpaper in their new offices. He was luckier than he had any right to be, because the first thing he did after he slipped a map behind the mirror frame to come back for later was roll up to his neighborhood bar and tell ALL HIS FRIENDS about his fabulous exploit.

Creative 35mm Photography: Traveling With Your Camera is another photography advice book, this one from 1965. Most of the advice is not bad, but the author is convinced that all the residents of every country are going to be perfectly delighted to have their picture taken and you shouldn't ask permission because it only makes people self-conscious. I can't agree!

What I Plan to Read Next

I got some books for Christmas which I'll probably try to read before the end of the year. I got slightly more than expected because in addition to the books I got as presents, my parents had read a couple of books and wanted to talk about them with me, so added them to my luggage. This means the bookshelf I had almost cleared off is back to its former abundance. But I have confidence that it will be clear again soon.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

Be Frank With Me was a "blind-date book" from the new bookstore (wrapped in brown paper with a description on the front) and a mild disappointment - sadly, the title is the best part. A reclusive novelist who lost all her money in a Ponzi scheme has to write a new book for the first time in twenty years, so the publisher sends an incompletely-characterized personal assistant to help out. "Helping out" turns out to mean looking after Frank, the reclusive author's nine-year-old son, who loves old movies, facts, and dressing up in an improbably wide range of vintage menswear styles. He also has some serious emotional difficulties, including a tendency to whack his head against various walls and poles. His school is weirdly blase about and unprepared for these tendencies for a posh elementary school in 2009, and his mysterious psychaitrist is apparently just there to assure the reader that Frank isn't being totally neglected. Frank is somewhat less loveable than advertised but far more so than the author or the assistant, both annoying nonentities. The reclusive author bought a giant glass house for her recluse cave, refuses to work with computers OR surrender any pages to the assistant (all but guaranteeing that there will be a spectacular housefire just when needed) and is apparently incapable of inventing anything, even the names of characters, so when the assistant and the long-suffering editor finally read the draft of the second novel, it's just the novel you've already read but with one name changed. The assistant, who is also the narrator, has a degree in accounting but can't bring herself to give up the wacky romcom jobs she loves so well. I spent most of this short book wondering if I should just stop reading, but in the end inertia won the day and I made it all the way to the groaner of an ending, feeling like my heart had been half-heartedly pelted with HotHands hand warmers to absolutely no avail.

I wasn't sure for a long time how I felt about Long Live the Tribe of Fatherless Girls, but I think I finally figured it out: it's got some beautiful individual essays but is shapeless as a whole. The shapelessness might be deliberate, because cluttered with gritty lyricism and hard to follow is how life is sometimes, but it was a drawback for me, one of those promising debuts that has 500 amazing opening paragraphs and no bones. I'm still not sure how much my opinion is being unduly influenced by my perennial issue with contemporary memoirs, which is that if I meet an author and her girlfriend at a reading, I don't like to have already read the heartbreaking details of their sad coping sex. I realize this is a me problem, but it's still distracting.

What I'm Reading Now

This lazy toleration of things that we (in our honest moments) realize should not be in the picture, is a very prevalent photographic philosophy, and is the principal reason that there are so many bad pictures in the world.


Outdoor Portraiture, (1940), by William Mortensen, is just what it says it is, a book about taking portraits outdoors. Why did I buy this book? I've had it for at least five years. I hardly ever take pictures and I'm not writing a novel about a slightly pedantic amateur photographer in the 1940s - I guess I just wanted to read it. From the examples of his own work, Mortensen appears to be an arty portraitist, but not a very "high-brow" one, to use the parlance of the times - he likes winsome female models gathering cockles and mussels in wispy light. He can be very hard on the millions of schlubs who just want to snap some pictures that look roughly like their friends and family. I am sorry to say that I can't even tell what is supposed to be so bad about half the "bad" pictures he puts forth as examples.

Unfortunately, this very sentimental interest in the subject is apt to keep him from appreciating how bad his results really are. )

And Ancient Evenings, of course! Norman Mailer has embarked on an epic id-safari into the ripe heart of Mailerity, and I could not be happier to be his long-suffering boatman.

What I Plan to Read Next

Everything's coming up Mailer for the foreseeable future, but I might also be reading Leaving Atlanta by Tayari Jones and/or a book of true spy stories courtesy of my spy-story-loving father-in-law.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

I barely finished Lilith's Brood in time for book club last week! I can recommend it highly if you want to start a lively discussion about consent or biological determinism, or if you just want to make a lot of jokes about tentacles. As a book it was a little talky, especially once we get into the later generations and everyone is constantly explaining Oankali mating rituals to everyone else, but always interesting and disturbing.

By far my favorite part of Blood Heir was the five-page "Acknowledgements" at the end, which might not include literally everyone Amelie Wen Zhao ever took a workshop with and every one of their inside jokes, but certainly strives to create an impression of comprehensiveness. Everyone gets a personalized message about how much they helped and how much she loves them. This is too much, but it's heartfelt and lovably embarrassing, like the love-from-mom-and-dad ads in high school theater programs. The novel itself is made of cliches, in something close to its original meaning of a ready-made printer's block that saves the compositor the trouble of making up common phrases from scratch. Even within the book, the fugitive princess and her redemption-seeking criminal companion make a dramatic plunge into cold water three separate times. I'm not opposed to cliches at all, but for whatever reason the collage of them didn't work for me here.

I expected to still be reading A Visit from the Goon Squad by now, but it was one of those books that you pick up intending to read a chapter or two and finish late the same night, not because of suspense or unanswered questions, but simply because it's easier and more pleasant to keep going. Now that I'm no longer reading it, I'm not sure how I feel about it, but it must have been good or I wouldn't have read it all at once, right? There were some chapters I loved - the slideshow diary was a standalone standout - and some that I didn't. I don't know why I was completely unable to believe or tolerate the genocidal dictator PR business, but I was.

What I'm Reading Now

The Silence of the Girls by Pat Barker! This first-person Iliad retelling by Briseis is fantastic so far. The only other thing I've read by Barker is Regeneration and its sequels, and her narration is just as casually, uncomfortably at home in this more distant past.

I'll probably end up sympathizing with T Kira Madden's memoir Long Live the Tribe of Fatherless Girls more than I love it, but it's too early to tell.


What I'm Not Completely Sure How to Get Rid Of

I skimmed my way to the end of The Library of the World's Best Literature, and now the problem is finding it a new home. I've had a lot of success mailing various things to people through Freecycle.org, but the Library is too heavy to mail, and too heavy to carry anywhere without a car. There's a used bookstore within a couple hours of here that would probably take it, but having worked in a used bookstore, I don't really want to burden them. I feel like its best home would be either with someone who cuts up books for art projects, or else with some weirdo like my dad (and me, as it turns out) who likes to keep a few out-of-date encyclopedias around for entertainment purposes - someone who would use it, one way or another. But I can't be too picky with an incredibly heavy 26-volume incomplete set that I don't actually have room for.

What I Plan to Read Next

There's only one book and it's Ancient Evenings by Norman Mailer, last of the 99. I put it off over the weekend so I could finish some other things, but the time has come at last.
evelyn_b: (Default)
The Rebel Angels, second to last of the 99 Novels, was a stress-free treat, all about awful college eccentrics and not-quite-as-awful college eccentrics grappling with the question of who gets what out of a dead collector-hoarder's apartment stuffed with treasures, and with some questions of their own along the way. Structurally, it's a comedy, but it's too diffuse and chatty to produce a lot of laughs; what you get instead is an enveloping sense of mildly erudite coziness - so much so that I actually forgot there was a murder in this book until just now. I did not forget Ozy Froats, the world-famous feces researcher, collecting and slivering an endless supply of stool samples in search of the mysterious (possibly nonexistent) relationship between temperament and digestion, or the chaotic ex-monk Parlabane's inexhaustible appetites and massive, terrible novel.

I especially liked the character of Maria, a realistically implausible young weirdo who is completely out of step with her age cohort, but self-assured within her field. Her relationship with her mother and uncle, well-off Toronto landlords and Gypsy luthiers, is one of the most enjoyble in a book full of pleasingly vexed relationships. I have no idea if Davies' idea of Romani culture is based in research, experience, or in recklessly making shit up. I didn't love all the loose-jointed love triangle business between Maria and her older male colleagues, but it helped keep the plot shuffling along, which kept a thoroughly relaxing book in front of me, so I can't really complain.

I was happy to learn, via [personal profile] rachelmanija, that this book has sequels. I'll read them one of these days, though unfortunately I seem to be losing my university library checkout privileges at the same time I'm gaining my freedom from the 99. This is a good reason to read more from my own bookshelves, where some books have been patiently waiting for a decade or more, and a bad reason to Support Local Booksellers by just ordering everything I want from the new bookstore whenever I feel like it. I guess time will tell which side of my nature is going to win out in 2020.
evelyn_b: (Default)
The Mosquito Coast (by Paul Theroux) and Darconville's Cat (by Alexander Theroux) are next to each other in the 99 Novels book and next to each other on their shelf at the library. They are not alike at all, except that they are both about ill-adjusted men whose intelligence is no consolation. Darconville's Cat is a big, noisy, goofy, Renaissance-inflected 3D labyrinth about a sweaty, loathing-lit young litterateur with trad-Catholic inclinations, who is also lithe and attractive to women, like Ignatius J. Reilly's most secret self-insert. While working on his own large grimoire of a novel, he realizes he needs money for food and whatnot, so he takes a job teaching English at an academically negligible women's college in Virginia. The descriptions of the American South and its culture are wonderfully, indulgently mean and musical. They are like someone read Nabokov On America and thought, "The problem with this guy is twofold: not enough adjectives and not enough contempt." This kind of thing is not going to be everyone's cup of tea, and it probably reflects well on you if it's not yours, but I enjoy a little mean music from time to time.

Darconville falls in love with a student, Isabel; she reciprocates, but the idyll is spotty, like most idylls, and doesn't last. When Darconville gets a surprise appointment to Harvard, she gets cold feet and doesn't join him as planned.

At Harvard, he meets an insane misogynist eunuch who lives in an attic, Dr. Crucifer, who may be a figment of his imagination/his doubts about Isabel made manifest. There's actually nothing to strongly support this interpretation as far as I can tell, but I thought it anyway just because he's so weird and shrill, and because that's the role he plays. Dr. Crucifer yells at Darconville about the sterility of love and the perfidity of women for about a million pages, with plenty of pungent inventiveness (and many a reference to Elizabeth I of England, the patron monster of the book, her bald head and spurious virginity). Isabel breaks up with him in an inconsiderate and embarrassing way; Crucifer tries to get him to kill her (one of the chapters is just a long, LONG list of gruesome murder methods, shrieked by Crucifer at the top of his lungs); he goes to Venice instead and dies of sadness and/or pneumonia. The summary doesn't do it justice, because it's not really a novel about a guy who has an ill-fated affair with his student, but a very long, deliberately fantastic, many-fingered jam session on the theme of The Girl I'll Never Understand. This is a deeply eccentric book by a guy who clearly doesn't mind you thinking he loves language better than people.

The Mosquito Coast is spare and lean and more or less contemporary, rather than early-modern, alchemical, and gouty. Allie Fox is an inventor who has always been on the outside of things, but it's not because he's a failure, it's SOCIETY that's the failure. He picks fights with hardware store employees about carrying imported goods - where's their Made In America tubes and hoses? He picks fights with every single retailer about their ridiculous prices, and prefers to shop at the local dump. He's convinced that America is going to be destroyed any minute and he, the last true man in America and possibly the last on earth - is going to have to start the whole world over again, his way this time. One day he buys a load of mosquito netting and some baseball caps (since the better hats are too expensive), and moves the family to Honduras, to a shabby port city and then upriver, where he bullies a few families into joining his icemaking scheme in the middle of nowhere. He declares to his family that anyway, America is destroyed now, there was a huge war just as they left, so now the wasteland is literal and there's no back to go. (Spoiler: America has not been destroyed in this book). For a little while, things are almost ok, in spite of the craziness of the plan. Then they aren't anymore.

Allie is a brilliantly compelling family-size monster who burns up all the oxygen in the book, so that the other characters in his orbit - Charlie, the wary and confused young narrator, his siblings, and their mother - barely have the chance to exist, and barely manage to do or feel anything except in reaction to him. This is both effective and a little frustrating. I found myself wishing that the mother in particular could have been more of a character - I wanted to know something about how she came to hitch her wagon to this dangerous and eternally disappointing star. But even if she'd wanted to talk about it to her kids, there was no opportunity. Mad Dad is always watching. There's a scene where they're on one of their duct-taped river boats, miles from anywhere they've ever been, and he dives under to fetch a boat part out of the mud. He's gone for so long that the family starts to panic, and so long after that that they start to talk about what to do next if he's dead. They'll have to find a town - they'll have to go home. Relief sneaks over each of them. Then he bursts out of the water, shouting, "Traitors!"

There are now only two books left of the 99 Novels - The Rebel Angels by Robertson Davies, which looks to be some kind of breezy campus thing, and my main man Norman Mailer's Egyptian shitstravaganza, Ancient Evenings.
evelyn_b: (Default)
The End of the Rainbow

I finished Gravity's Rainbow on Monday night, over a couple of glasses of wine. The last thirty pages would have been breathtaking, if I hadn't been so exhausted by the first 850. Oh, well!

What I've Finished Reading

Dawn, first book in a series of (so far) beautifully upsetting tentacle tales by Octavia Butler. The people of Earth went and destroyed the world like they always seem to do, and a handful of survivors are put into suspended animation by a group of painfully earnest sapioculturists who are going to use the humans to enrich their own genetic diversity, and give them back their planet, more or less, in return. The catch is that they've controlled human fertility so that now the humans can only have part-alien children with alien assistance. Lilith, formerly of Earth, tries to resist for a while but there's only so much resisting to be done. The Oankali, the alien savior/captors, call what they're doing a Trade (with capital letters) and are convinced it's a biological imperative that they can't help; the humans feel rather that they're being tamed, and resent it without much efficacy.

What I'm Reading Now

I was hugely disappointed in the Library's section on Chinese Literature. The editorial essay by Robert K. Douglas can't refrain from ruminating about the virtues and defects of "the Chinese mind." National minds are one of the running themes of the anthology and of 1902 in general, to be fair, but here the editor's ideas seem to have prevented him from making any effort at all. He frets about the defects of Chinese poetry and dismisses all of Chinese fiction as creaky wooden morality tales that no Westerner could possibly enjoy, but provides no examples: instead, the entire literature selection following the essay consists of four pages of "selected maxims" because the editor thinks that "the Chinese mind" does maxims that much better than it does anything else. By contrast, [Ancient] Egyptian Literature gets over 120 pages of multiple genres of writing in multiple eras. Japanese Literature is not quite as long, but includes novel excerpts, drama, and several kinds of poetry. For the most part, I've been pleasantly surprised by the Library's attempt to cast a wide net - this laziness is maybe not totally unexpected, but still an unfortunate exception to the rule.

Finally finishing Gravity's Rainbow means I get to reward myself with William Dean Howells' My Literary Passions, the simple story of a man who loves books and would be delighted to tell you about some of the books he has loved in his life. I got it from the library yesterday and took it to the arboretum to read a couple of chapters next to a giant oak tree. Then, when it got too dark to read, I went inside and read a couple more. It's even pleasanter than I expected.

I shall try not to use authority, however, and I do not expect to speak here of all my reading, whether it has been much or little, but only of those books, or of those authors that I have felt a genuine passion for. I have known such passions at every period of my life, but it is mainly of the loves of my youth that I shall write, and I shall write all the more frankly because my own youth now seems to me rather more alien than that of any other person


I've barely begun The Mosquito Coast, one of four remaining 99 Novels but it, too, has been love at first sight. On the very first page there's a wary child narrator and a mad dad who took his kids out of school and keeps yelling about how he's THE LAST MAN because the toxic combination of civiization and (especially) Japanese electronics are killing all the brute virtues, oh dear. And there are woodcuts! It's nice to open a book and feel happy and excited to be reading it, instead of concrete-overshod and obscurely crawled-on.

What I Plan to Read Next

I'd completely forgotten, until it arrived at my door on Friday, that I'd pre-ordered Blood Heir by Amelie Wen Zhao, back when Zhao was for some reason getting bombarded by negative reviews all beginning "I haven't read this book, but. . ." So now I've got this big pseudo-Russian-looking YA fantasy book on my hands. Will it be good? Will it be bad? I'll probably find out reasonably soon.

There is also plenty more deeply uncomfortable tentacle action coming my way from Octavia Butler.
evelyn_b: (the future is beautiful)
Creation is a large, lumbering, harmless and likeable book about a guy who just happens to have been born in time to meet a lot of ancient philosophers and founders of world religions (Socrates, Confucious, Lao Tzu, and the Buddha all make an appearance). He is also the grandson of Zoroaster and the long-suffering best friend of Xerxes. It gives the overwelming impression of being a leisurely party thrown by the author (Gore Vidal) for the author, which makes it pleasant even when it drags a little. There is a lot of war and violence in retrospect, and a tremendous amount of plotting and backstabbing at multiple courts, none of which leaves much of an impression or creates any suspense whatsoever; the fun of this book comes maybe 90% from the narrator's languidly judgmental voice, with the remaining 10% from an exotic traveler's tale or two. There is plenty of philosophy, of the reefer-wispiest and least visceral kind.

Anthony Burgess thought that Creation was "a genuine recreation of the remote past," and "an incredibly detailed and convincing picture of the ancient world." This is a reasonable impression to have but it wasn't mine. I thought it was an incredibly detailed and convincing picture of a guy making elaborately researched mods to his favorite ancient-history holodeck program, which is not necessarily better or worse but slightly different.

Two of Gore Vidal's best-selling history bricks, Burr and 1876, were part of the background book-furniture of my life growing up, and I am sorry to say that I never gave them any thought at all. This book made me think I should go ahead and give Burr a try, since Aaron Burr had my most sadly relatable song in Hamilton and Creation was enjoyable enough.
evelyn_b: (Default)
How can you still be reading Gravity's Rainbow? Haven't you finished it yet?

No. I am on page 620 of 887 as of this posting.

Other people like Gravity's Rainbow just fine, don't they?

Other people love Gravity's Rainbow. thedoubtfulguest shared this piece by Gerald Howard alongside several other writers, all of whom have had the thrilling experience of liking Gravity's Rainbow, who are able to describe it with love and understanding, and who compare it, with justice, to some books that I loved. There is interesting publishing history here as well as criticism. These Pynchon fans are smart people who are good at reading books and writing about them. I encourage you to go and read them now instead of listening to me whine.

I call them the Rainbros. It's not meant to be dismissive. I envy them their happiness.

So what's wrong with you, then? Why do you just keep staring helplessly at this masterpiece of 20th Century lit like someone left a dead rat with a ribbon on it under your Christmas tree?

I don't know! Because he was he, because I was I, man. It's just one of those things.

Are you just a prude who only ever wants books to be nice?

Deep down, probably, though I try to rein in that tendency when I can. Here I've been less successful than usual. I definitely resented having to read the chapter in which Slothrop has sex with a twelve-year-old three times over, first to figure out if it was maybe actually a dream (no luck), and then to get the full import of the admittedly beautiful closing paragraphs. I also resented that after approx. 3727 pages, I still didn't care about Slothrop enough to be angry or disappointed or dismayed by this choice of his. The frictionless chrome forgettability of every single character in this cast of thousands is probably part of the point (one reviewer suggests that I have misunderstood the book by "thinking about characters when [I] should be laughing at grotesques"); the selfish misuse of children by adults definitely is. I also slightly resent my total inability to care about these points as presented by Gravity's Rainbow.

So are the Rainbros all liars? Is this book actually garbage?

No, they're telling the truth. It's ambitious, polymathic, fearlessly strange and meticuously constructed. There are gems in this dream-sewer. That doesn't mean I have to like it.

Can you provide an example of the writing style?

Of course! Please be aware that the "writing style" of Gravity's Rainbow is always shifting and this example may not be representative. It does, however, have plenty of songs.

Final assembly went on in Stollen 41 )

Isn't it time to admit you're just bad at reading?

Yes, but being bad at reading hasn't prevented me from enjoying many other books. I even enjoyed parts of Giles Goat-Boy, an almost totally inexcusable waste of my time! The Rainbow is a special case, and that's why I'm admitting defeat. I mean, I'm still going to read the last 200+ pages, but the dream of somehow coming to appreciate it has been thanked for its time and released Marie Kondo-style into the universe. Maybe in ten years I'll try again.

Would you rather still be reading Giles Goat-Boy right now? Be honest.

No, not even Thomas Pynchon can make me wish I were still reading Giles Goat-Boy. But I do find myself thinking longingly of blank walls I might be staring at instead.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

The Painted Veil by W. Somerset Maugham! It's been a while since I checked in on my mopey wannabe sage friend Maugham, and I'd been meaning to read this one for a long time. I enjoyed it! but I can't describe it without spoilers. )

This is one of many classic novels of spiritual awakening that is also a good argument for no-fault divorce.

What I'm Reading Now

My Library of the World's Best Literature is more incomplete than I thought. I finally noticed that the title page said "Thirty-One Volumes" and did some research. In addition to Volume 27 (Zoroaster-???), it's also missing volumes dedicated to Songs, Hymns, and Lyrics, a Biographical Dictionary of Authors, and an Index-Guide to Systematic Readings.

About Frances Hodgson Burnett, the editors of the Library say, "'Little Lord Fauntleroy' (1886) is the best known of a series of stories nominally written for children, but intended to be read by their elders."

I would like to share a story from the collection. This is by Henry C. Bunner, who was apparently famous in the second half of the nineteenth century for his gentle comedies of urban life. This story is called "The Love Letters of Smith" and it is a very small romance that begins with a pewter mug of beer. Luckily, it and the short story collection where it originated (Short Sixes: Stories to be Read While the Candle Burns) are available on Project Gutenberg, so I don't have to type it all out or mail anyone the incredibly heavy volume of the Library where I found it.

I'm deep in the latest two gigantic 99 Novels books, Darconville's Cat by Alexander Theroux and Creation by Gore Vidal, and they're both perfectly fine. Alex Theroux is having a grand old time making fun of Southern naming patterns and Vidal is living it up in a reasonably well-researched but flexible and cooperative past in which he gets to meet Socrates, Confucius, the Buddha, and Lao Tzu and muse on their respective virtues and vices for 600 leisurely pages. Gravity's Rainbow is also perfectly fine in the abstract, but I keep finding excuses not to read it.

What I Plan to Read Next

Pattee's Dietetics (1935 edition), Composition and Grammar, and other books I bought for "research" ten years ago and am unlikely to need in the near future. Also: Lilith's Brood, a series of three novels by Octavia Butler (for a book club), just begun and beautifully unsettling.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

Charles W. Chesnutt, The Marrow of Tradition - a short 1901 novel about the (then contemporary and terrifying) post-Reconstruction white-supremacy push in Southern US politics, and a surprisingly smooth blend of journalism and melodrama. The riot that ends the book - really an armed coup deliberately organized by the white supremacist press to run prominent black citizens out of government and out of the town - is based on a real riot in Wilmington, North Carolina; the characters are based on types. There is a white heiress who fears and resents her mixed-race doppelganger half-sister, a hot-tempered "overseer class" race-baiter whom all the gentlemen despise for his bad manners but are perfectly happy to use as a weapon, a devoted nurse who has faithfully served the family for 28 generations (give or take), a saintly black doctor whose saintliness is severely tested, a kindly old gentleman's neer-do-well son, and so on.

Chesnutt is really at his best in his didactic or quietly observant passages. There are several large dramatic plot machines that keep the book moving but don't necessarily pierce the soul the way they're supposed to. What does: the half-overheard conversations before a lynching (making sure to start early in the evening so the kids can stay up for it), or the young doctor's musings after being strong-armed into the "colored" car when the train crosses into Virginia.

One of the plot points strains credulity a little more than necessary (I'll let you find out which) but this is well worth reading if you are interested in the period and don't mind lots of spelled-out dialect. It has the William Dean Howells Stamp of Approval! If you are interested in the period and DO mind eye dialect by the bucketload, I feel for you.

I've had a cold for the past week, which is a bad state in which to do most things but a good one in which to speed-read magazines you really only brought home for the cover. Thanks to my diminished attention span, I burned through several New Yorkers that had been waiting around for months.

What I'm Reading Now

Warning: The Telephone Book is going to resist you )

I probably won't finish The Telephone Book: Technology, Schizophrenia, Electric Speech by Avital Ronell - it's about philosophy and Heidegger, neither of which I understand, and I've decided that I'm too old to stand still for a self-indulgent critical pun-shower if I'm not actually enjoying it. I bought this book for its beautifully weird typography and because it's a technological-theory book (copyright 1989) whose once-ubiquitous technological cues have drifted toward obscurity. But I don't think I'll end up loving it very much as a book, and it's too water-damaged for me to want to keep it as an object.

Seventy-five pages into Creation I seriously doubt it's going to either save or ruin my life; it's more of a popcorn book, but very pleasant and chatty. I mean, there are guys getting their balls lopped off left and right and all kinds of grotesque religious and court drama among the Greeks and the Persians. . . but in a chatty way, and the chapters are short. It's good to have - I had reached a point for a while where all the books I had to read were slightly tougher nuts, and needed a break.

What I Plan to Read Next

I decided to test the ordering-a-book capabilities of the new bookstore in town, and they seem to be pretty good! In any case, I have Maaza Mengiste's The Shadow King with remarkably little trouble, though I probably won't get to it for a while.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

Death in Venice is barely a book; it's halfway between a novella and a long short story (the edition I have bundles it in with seven other stories). Aschenbach, a writer with mortality on the brain, goes to Venice for a holiday, notices a beautiful young boy staying in his hotel, and becomes so obsessed with him that he can't think of anything else, and basically tricks himself into staying in Venice as a cholera epidemic drives the rest of the tourists away.

The boy, Tadzio, is Polish and the writer is German, which neatly eliminates any question of him accidentally trying to have a conversation with the boy and it accidentally coming out creepy. At one point, he notices that the boy looks a little consumptive:

"He is delicate, he is sickly," Aschenbach thought. "He will most likely not live to grow old." He did not try to account for the pleasure the idea gave him.


Aschenbach is extra sensitive to the sadness of old guys because on his journey to Venice, there was a party of young men on holiday, all overdressed and fraternal and rowdy. But one of the guys in the group, he realizes to his horror, is not young at all, but OLD! He's dressed like the young men and acts just like them, but his hands are WRINKLED and his face is OLD. Why is he still pretending to be young? Why do the young guys even let him hang around them? The existence of this harmless stranger makes Aschenbach feel very bad about everything.

These feelings don't prevent Aschenbach from later getting his hair dyed and his skin "freshened up" in an attempt to get closer to Tadzio, but it does make him extra wistful about the prospect of young beauty made eternal by death. However, what actually happens is This is not really a spoiler because you will see it coming from 500 miles away like that guy in Lawrence of Arabia, but I still recommend watching it happen for yourself ) Thomas Mann seems he might be a hard guy to live with if he talks even a little like he writes, but I enjoy him.


What I'm Reading Now

The other stories bundled in with Death in Venice are not bad. My favorite right now is "A Man and His Dog," which is (thus far) literally just a guy describing his dog.

I was happy to see an entry for J.M. Barrie in the Library of the World's Best Literature, two years before the first appearance of Peter Pan. "The judgement of contemporaries is rarely conclusive; and we will not attempt to anticipate that of posterity. It may be said, however, that the best applicable touchstone of permanency is that of seeming continuously fresh to cultivated tastes after many readings; and that Mr. Barrie's four best books bear the test without failure."

Gravity's Rainbow continues exactly the same as before only more so.

What I Plan to Read Next

I brought back three more 99 Novels from the library, huge ones this time: Creation by Gore Vidal, Darconville's Cat by Alexander Theroux, and The Mosquito Coast by Paul Theroux - the latter is not as enormous as the other two and is probably just normal-sized. The other two are bricks. Creation charmed me right from the start because it's so unabashedly self-indulgent. The narrator is a Persian ambassador to Athens who has just heard a recitation by Herodotus and is upset. Now he is going to narrate a true account of some important events to his scribe, a conceit which will allow Gore Vidal to ramble down as many loosely connected paths as he pleases for as long as he feels like it.
evelyn_b: (Default)
If you'd told me when I was in my twenties that I was eventually going to read a novel about a fiftysomething writer who tries to recapture his lost youth by having lots of sex with a woman two years older than his daughter -- and not only endure it for a class or something, but love every sadly hilarious navel-gazing second of it -- I would have told you time travel had fried your brain. I used to have a strong prejudice against middle age men having affairs in fiction.

The strange thing is that I formed this prejudice at a time when I had read exactly zero books about middle-aged affair-havers (Lolita doesn't count). Instead, I had absorbed huge quantities of critical exhaustion with middle-aged affair-havers. A little of it was direct, from sources like David Foster Wallace's famous regretful takedown of John Updike's late fiction, but most of it was just floating around, casual and sourceless. I got the idea that Middle-Aged Intellectual Guy Has Affairs was one of the dominant plots of late 20th century literature, and that the right response to any individual example is to be bored and disgusted. I also found adultery unattractive for my own reasons, because as a reader it invariably just makes me annoyed with the adulterer for not being more easily embarrassed. The latter is still true, but it didn't hurt my enjoyment of Dubin's Lives at all.

William Dubin is a well-known biographer, which is symbolic because it allows him to worry that his own life has been neglected in favor of his stable of geniuses. His wife Kitty is an instantly loveable neurotic who fears fire and dishonesty. The girl he embarks on a "daring" affair with, Fanny Bick, is a wonderfully surly and plausible college dropout, callow and sharp and mixed-up and indifferent to the glowing youthful vitality that obsesses him. Early in the book, he takes Fanny to Venice as a bold romantic gesture and in an attempt to get his lust for her out of his system; she comes down with explosive diahrrea the first time they undress, spends the next two days in the bathroom, then leaves him for a cheesy young tour guide. Just before she leaves, Dubin can tell something's up, because she's suddenly and inexplicably plucked out her chin hairs. This beautiful tour-de-force of bathos set a seal on my heart; it made me willing to forgive even more than I ended up needing to.

Then Dubin goes back to Connecticut and spends months on end obsessing over his missed opportunity, until he and Fanny finally get together. Then he spends months trying to hide it from his wife (so as not to hurt her, because he could never hurt her) and fending off Fanny's attempts to get him to move in with her permanently. There are assorted other affairs and ill-judged gestures, and plots involving Dubin's grown-up son and daughter - lives Dubin would like to understand but is seldom granted access to. Once, he stubbornly goes for a walk in a blizzard (Kitty calls every kind of snow a "blizzard," but this one is real) and gets lost a few feet from the road. He grows old and decrepit and gets a new lease on life and sinks into age again. This "plot" plods hopelessly through the seconds of Dubin's life like a dyspeptic insomniac, but its repetitiveness and frustrations are also a pleasure, because the fretful narration is also funny and kind. Even more of a pleasure is Malamud's loving attention to weather and seasons, which reminded me of the best parts of Lady Chatterly's Lover, the plants and the mud and the chickens -- appropriate because the biography Dubin is struggling with is D.H. Lawrence.

Six more novels to go! Can that really be right? Apparently, yes, if you subtract enough eventually you get alarmingly close to zero.
evelyn_b: (cocoa)
Not to be confused with the Doctor Who episode of the same name, or with River Song or the Aztec lady the Doctor accidentally marries in Season 1, The Doctor's Wife is an adultery story that begins with the title character's brother trying unsucessfully to locate her after she's left her husband, initially for a younger man, but eventually for herself.

There's a prologue where we learn that Sheila has disappeared, and the younger man doesn't know where she is any more than anyone else, and then it swings back in time to tell Sheila's story. What happens: Sheila and her husband Kevin are supposed to be on vacation in France. Sheila's there ahead of Kevin because he's had to stay behind to do doctor stuff, feeling a little relieved because Kevin is kind of a jerk who prides himself on his practicality and makes fun of her for liking books and wanting to go on vacations. She suspects he doesn't actually want to come at all. As a young girl she had some kind of a self or at least the beginnings of one, but she feels like everything interesting about her has been tamped down and soaked through by the dreary persistent drizzle of real life. She meets an attractive young American in Paris, a nice normal guy who shares some of her interests. They hit it off; she skips lunch with her old friend to spend the morning with him, and when she moves to Nice, he takes the train down to see her again.

One thing leads to another (another being plenty of sex) and after a few days Shelia decides she isn't going back. By end, she's removed herself completely from her old life, including her unhappy teenage son, to begin again on her own terms.

There's a move in this book I'm not sure how I felt about. This came as a surprise to me, so maybe it's a spoiler: ) But maybe I'm just being squeamish? Other than that I liked it pretty well, though I won't be naming any routers after it.

There are actually two doctors' wives in this book: Sheila and her brother's wife Agnes, whom we see from his perspective as nosy and meddling, as ill-matched to him as Sheila's husband is to her; you get the impression that he understands her disappearance more than he can say or think out loud.
evelyn_b: (Default)
A Movie I Watched

There is a problem I've been trying to overcome, not always successfully, and it's that I'm constantly being embarrassed by my own reactions to books and other media, to the extent where I sometimes worry if I have any genuine reactions at all. (What does it mean to be genuine? Maybe that's a question for another time). When I find myself hating Gravity's Rainbow, for example, my mind will immediately start generating excuses, to protect itself from imaginary accusations of philistinism. Am I reading too quickly? Am I not paying enough attention? Is the cheap mass-market paperback too densely printed and the paper too discolored? I don't mind telling you (at tedious length) that I hate it, but I also have this annoying compulsion to let you know that I know that you might think I'm an idiot, just in case. Part of the purpose of keeping a public reading journal is to get over this kind of thinking and pointless hedging, but it doesn't always work.

There's also an inverse: when a work of art tells me exactly what I want to hear so seductively that I start reflexively mistrusting both it and myself. Pride was like that. It's the story of some gay activists in London who collect money to support a Welsh miners' strike in the 1980s. At first the miners worry about the optics of welcoming a gay rights group and the Londoners worry that they'll be laughed out of town or worse, but both groups take a chance anyway and befriend one another. I watched this movie while patching up some jeans, and it was NEEDLESSLY HEARTWARMING and now whenever I try to work on my jeans patches I get weepy all over again. I tried scolding myself for susceptibility, but what's the use? I'll be a soppy kneejerk liberal till the day I die, so I might as well enjoy myself.

What I've Finished Reading

Clean Up Your Act! Effective Ways to Organize Paperwork -- and Get it Out Of Your Life! is an office self-help book from 1992, which makes it as much a historical tour of the paper-based office as it is an advice book. It also slightly overestimates the value of the digital future in bringing about a world of efficiency - though not nearly as much as you might expect.

It has some good advice applicable to my 95%-online job - in fact, it might be slightly more helpful to me personally than a more contemporary book of the same kind, because it doesn't assume I'm going to download and learn a bunch of new programs in the name of simplifying my day. The prompt to think a little more about what I need to put in writing vs. what I can bring up at the weekly meeting has already brought about a change for the better.

What I'm Reading Now

Other problems I am struggling without success to overcome: Gravity's Rainbow, natch. Every now and then it has a good moment and it just makes me more annoyed with whatever convergence of Pynchon, myself, and the universe has conspired to make the rest of it a bleak black cloud of murky wit and petulant boredom.

Luckily, Codependence is very good and The Good Soldier Svejk is messy and meandering in a way that I enjoy. I'm also reading very slowly through The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire and a 26-volume late 19thC aspirational monstrosity called Library of the World's Best Literature (currently reading a very small selection of the letters of Abigail Adams, which are pretty excellent). I think I've mentioned this book before? It's slated to be turned into home decor or a hip book craft eventually, but I feel compelled to at least skim it all before I let it go. This is almost certainly more than its original intended audience would have done, but so it goes.


What I Plan to Read Next

There's a brand new bookstore in town, just a 15-minute walk from home and on the way to the university library. It opened on Saturday and inventory so far is small but attractive. I bought The Silence of the Girls by Pat Barker and a "blind date book" wrapped in brown paper - which I'll unwrap when I get to it.

Every day brings me closer to William Dean Howells and My Literary Passions! I can't take it home from the library yet because I don't actually have the willpower not to start reading it & spoil my motivational structure. But it's there, waiting for me! Soon and very soon! There are also the rest of the Final Nine 99 Novels, and probably most of them will be good.
evelyn_b: (Default)
Walker is my name and I am the same. Riddley Walker. Walking my riddels where ever theyve took me and walking them now on this paper the same.

I dont think it makes no differents where you start the telling of a thing. You never know where it begun realy. No moren you know where you begun your oan self. You myt know the place and day and time of day when you ben beartht. You myt even know the place and day and time when you been got. That dont mean nothing tho. You stil dont know where you begun.


I loved Riddley Walker from beginning to end, partly just because, like Anthony Burgess, I am a sucker for made-up future dialects. In Riddley Walker something or other blew up a long time ago, and London-whatever-that-was went under water, and it was dark a long time until the days came back, but came back wrong. Or maybe it happened some other way, you can't be sure with tales. The Pry Mincer and the Wes Mincer have been doing instructive puppet shows about it so long that who knows what's real and what's just made up for politics? Anyhow some people are getting back the ways of writing things down that you used to have, so Riddley Walker, 12, is writing this down for you, whoever you are, in the dark future of the dark future, or wherever people live who read these things.

The made-up futurelect is beautiful as these things go, and easier to read than Gravity's Rainbow. Here's another sample for you!

counting clevverness and where it leads )

Of course if it had really been 2300 years since Eusa and Mr Clevver tore apart the Little Shyning Man of the Addom (as another version of the story goes), you wouldn't expect to be able to understand Riddley's language at all (and how would the k in "know" have survived any period of illiteracy? You'd have to start your own worldbuilding wiki just to explain it). But this is a nice evocative middle ground, where every variant spelling blooms with punny exegesis.

This book was a joy to read. I spent most of it thinking that I liked the language and the setting but wasn't going to care very much about the plot. But it pulled an Ishiguro, as we call it in my house when a book tricks you into thinking you're riding calmly above it right up until it suddenly drowns you with a tidal wave of your own feelings. By the end it got its roots into me and they're still holding on.
evelyn_b: (Default)
A Realization

Last weekend I took some books to a used bookstore in Atlanta. I had about two-thirds of a box and was looking around for some extra books to fill it, and I realized that I've pared my books down enough that everything on the shelves is either something I want to read or something I want to keep for now. So now it's just a matter of reading those unread books. That may or may not be a good sign; it's still a lot of books.

Anyway, I ended up taking two boxes and bringing back four books, which is a pretty good ratio. And they were all books I wanted to read right away, rather than "interesting" or "reference" books likely to sit on my shelf for years on end.

What I've Finished Reading

I finished L'art de la Simplicité: How to Live More with Less a while ago, and there really isn't anything to say about it except that it's by far the laziest of all the incredibly lazy "simplify your life!" books I've been reading (a relative with mild-to-medium hoarding tendencies tends to accumulate them; I've been helping her de-accumulate). It's sloppy, judgmental, pushy, and infuriatingly vague. Maybe this is because the author is French and the French have different expectations from a self-help book, or maybe it's because the author is lazy and has already received an advance so who cares what the actual words are. But I wanted to share this passage, because it is one of the purest nuggets of nonsense in this bonanza bullshit mine:

During the Great Depression of the 1930s, money was far less important than style. Almost every family had lost out, so that money was no longer a distinguishing factor from one household to the next. What counted instead were vocabulary and diction, education, moral values and a taste for things of quality. Everyone used their finest things every day, and put flowers on the table at mealtimes.


Maybe author Dominique Loreau's grandparents had a great time during the Depression, putting flowers on everything and rediscovering true values. That's not impossible. EVERYONE, though? I have no idea what her source is (The Philadelphia Story? it's impossible to know because citing your sources is too much clutter for Loreau) but all this business about flowers and education is news to me. My family's Depression stories were all more along the lines of "sold the bed for scrap metal" and "found a can of beans in the street one time and ate it all at one go," so I am going to assume that experiences during this time, like experiences throughout history, were more varied than Loreau suggests.

Also, for all the time I spent obnoxiously making fun of the title You Are Not Stendhal (all of you outside my head don't know the half of it), I liked the title poem almost best of all. Overall not a life-changing book of poetry for me, but not awful for a random library pick. Maybe there will be others.

What I'm Reading Now

Codependence by Amy Long is a memoir about opioid use and opioid addiction, so far very mildy experimental (the first chapter is numbered block paragraphs, the next three are called "Product Warning" and "Patient Prescription Information") and potentially good, though it's too early to tell for sure. The Good Soldier Svejk continues amiable, dirty, and impervious to the military virtues.

Dubin's Lives is extremely good in a lot of ways, but Dubin is already making me sad, because his neurotic sweetheart of a wife Kitty is such a delight, and I already know from the back cover copy that he is going to embark on a "daring affair with a woman half his age." Man, how about you don't? Forget it, Jake, it's the 99 novels.

What I Plan to Read Next

All books there be must end at last. I have 550 pages left in Gravity's Rainbow, which means only 550 pages left till Oliver Wendell Holmes William Dean Howells! (I can't believe I mixed them up just because they both had three names, but on the other hand, I can D:). I can't wait, but I'm going to have to. I've also bought a book called You've Had Your Time, a memoir by Anthony Burgess, to read after I get done with his list.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

I completley forgot to say anything about Farewell Companions last week, which is an injustice. because reading Farewell Companions felt like a luxurious vacation in my head. It takes place in Dublin before and during World War II, and is a little like a quieter, slower and gentler Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, only one of the young men actually becomes a priest and sits in ambiguity and loneliness among the ghosts of himself and his friends and his old self. But that only happens at the very end. Most of it is low-key dreaming and striving and the war changing everything, and hikes in the mountains, and breathtakingly boring clerical work - you get the feeling that if Tim's job had been a little less soul-crushing, he might have stuck it out another few years and gotten married instead of taking up with the seminary. Maybe that's just me. Anyway, it's a good book and an unexpectedly good pairing with the wonderful TV comedy Derry Girls, which takes place in a different city and a different time but shares some history and a rhythm of speech or two and a pack of casual observations about Catholic school that I will never not be a sucker for as long as I live.

Book History Vol. 12: 2009 is a collection of essays on book history, and might be subtitled "Books Do Furnish A Room" - it has several articles on books as furniture, the broader meaning of the word "furniture" in the early modern period, and the rise of the uniform author set in book publishing (with a sideline on Henry James' mania for post-publication revision). There was also an essay called "Toward a History of Children as Readers," which included a discussion of library surveys from the 1920s and 30s.

One popular "genre" that emerged in multiple open-ended surveys was that of sad books. A librarian commented on this "fondness of girls for mournful stories" [. . .] One girl described her proclivity for stories "about sorrowful ladies who die for love," with some qualifications: "I don't like them if they just die,. . .but I love them when they slay themselves with daggers and swords!"



What I'm Reading Now

YOU ARE NOT STENDHAL. This provocatively-titled book thinks it can tell me who I'm not. HOW DO YOU KNOW, BOOK? In fact, the book is right and I am not Stendhal. You can tell because Stendhal wrote an entire giddy book in 52 days and I took 10 years just to fail to write a boring one. There are many other differences if you look closely. The poetry here is not my favorite kind of poetry, but sometimes it nudges you and goes, "hey?" Here is one poem that made brief contact with my ribs:

'The Stories' by Daniel Hughes )

I'm also reading The Good Soldier Svejk, a Czech comic novel from the early 1920s that is the grandfather of all sad war satires, though it's not really sad in the same way that Catch-22 or Slaughterhouse-Five or maybe even Monstrous Regiment are sad; it's more like a cartoon from the days when cartoons were more likely to be about put-upon stray cats and hapless hoboes getting pronged in the rear than about the power of friendship and the imagination. The common thread is absurdity. Svejk keeps getting arrested for being too patriotic at the wrong moments (the authorities think he's being ironic) and when he finally links up with a regiment, he misses the train through an honest overconsumption of beer and has to walk (the wrong way) to the front, where he is mistaken first for a deserter, then for a spy. Will he ever see the action he claims to crave? Possibly not, but he will drink a lot of beer, tell rambling stories, and wheel more than one drunk chaplain home from the officer's mess in a wheelbarrow while Austro-Hungarian officials wheeze and puff with fury under their silly murderhats. It's pretty good. I probably don't need to tell you that I am enjoying it more than its sweaty grand-nephew Gravity's Rainbow, though Gravity's Rainbow has gotten slightly better over the past dozen pages.


A Question For Readers

How do you feel about authors who make significant revisions to their own work after it's published? Would you rather they didn't? Does it depend entirely on the case? I felt a little shocked by Henry James, but wasn't sure why it bothered me. I'm not shocked by myself when I fix mistakes in two-year-old Dreamwidth posts, so what's the issue? Maybe because I'm imagining buying a new edition of a book I loved, only to discover that in the meantime the author had stuffed every paragraph chock full of ironies and adjectives like a clove orange and where did my book go?. Have you ever had this experience?

(I had this experience when a new translation of The Little Prince came out. That was a translation change rather than one made by the author, and it wasn't a crazy clove orange situation, but everything was slightly wrong and the bells didn't ring like they did in my mind).

What I Plan to Read Next

I promised myself that as soon as I finish Gravity's Rainbow, I can get William Dean Howell's book My Literary Passions out from the library. This book has been described by osprey archer as exactly the kind of thing I want to read all the time: a guy who loves books loving them extravagantly in public.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

A couple of 99 Novels that didn't leave a tremendous impression - Staying On is a very mildly comic blunderabout featuring saddish ex-Raj retirees who are about to get kicked out of their hotel, and their friends and acquintances. It was a little livelier than Life in the West, which I read all of very quickly in about the same frame of mind as I've heard stressed-out tech journalists describe the experience of reading Twitter: a half-bored, half-fixated twilight hunger. Not that I thought it was a bad book; I just got into that bag-of-chips airport mindset very early on and never managed to read it any other way. An ex-spy documentarian has trouble with his wife and feelings about human history. There's a lot of hanging around in hotels and lively perfunctory sex and smoking. It was all right, but I can't think of a single person I'd recommend it to - probably because I read it too fast, to be honest.

I am doing these books, which I mostly enjoyed, a disservice by dashing a handful of careless words over them, and probably doing another kind of disservice by squandering buckets of text on how much I don't get Gravity's Rainbow. Maybe I'm feeling more impatient than usual because. . .


It's The Final Countdown

There are now only NINE books remaining of the original 99 Novels. Should I slow down and take them one by one? Probably!

The Final Nine:
Gravity's Rainbow -- Thomas Pynchon
The Doctor's Wife -- Brian Moore
Dubin's Lives -- Bernard Malamud
Riddley Walker -- Russell Hoban
Darconville's Cat -- Alexander Theroux
The Mosquito Coast -- Paul Theroux
Creation -- Gore Vidal
The Rebel Angels -- Robertson Davies
Ancient Evenings -- Norman Mailer

I'm going to miss this beautiful list (even if I don't miss Gravity's Rainbow).


What I'm Reading Now

Gravity's Rainbow, natch! (as Pynchon and the Rainbros would say - "natch," like "sez," is one of the Pynchster's creaky gonzo voice tics). I've just read back up to about the point I left off - the famous Gross British Candies Set Piece, in which Tyrone Slothrop, the American with the mysteriously prophetic erections, is force-fed a bunch of disgusting British candies by his girlfriend of the moment and her landlady. This sequence is a massive clattering verbal contraption that looks a little like it ought to be hilarious but isn't quite. Actually, some of the candies presented for my horrified amusement sound nice. I'd eat a wine jelly right now if I had one.

Anyway, as Marie Kondo says (or "sez"), all books come into our lives to teach us something. The lesson being slowly doled out by Gravity's Rainbow may be that you can't love every book, or even feel mildly entertained by every book, no matter how much you want to. Some books come into our lives to teach us that some doors stay closed.

What I Plan to Read Next

Three new 99 Novels from the library, making up 1/3 of the total remaining! Riddley Walker, The Doctor's Wife, and Dubin's Lives. They are all of them not Gravity's Rainbow and I'm looking forward to reading them. I also picked up a poetry book called You Are Not Stendhal, which has nothing to do with anything, but I saw the title and immediately thought "YOU DON'T KNOW ME" and therefore had to take it home. I have to admit that the author does have me pegged in one very specific respect.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I Watched Instead of Reading

Last Friday, I went to see a play at the local university. The play was called Eurydice and purports to be a Eurydice-focused retelling of the Orpheus myth, though in fact it gives more time to Eurydice's dead dad, "one of the few among the dead who can still read and write." He writes letters to his daughter when she's still alive, and when she dies he re-teaches her to read and regales her with stories from his own memories. He makes her a room out of string because the dead don't get their own rooms. When Eurydice leaves to go back to the land of the living with Orpheus (a goofy idiot savant who looks like David Tennant's Doctor), her dad is so sad that he goes and soaks himself properly in the Lethe and lays himself down to drip forlornly off the edge of the stage. Then Eurydice comes back and can't get her dad to recognize her, so she does the same thing. Then Orpheus shows up, presumably having been killed by entitled fans after trying to release a mopey album of silences, and he doesn't remember anything, either. The end! For the curtain call, they turn up wrapped in bathrobes, which was a nice touch. I always enjoy seeing a live play and this one was no exception. It felt very unfinished, in spite of a lot of nice moments, and poor Eurydice in particular never really got to be much of a character (though to be fair, she did die very young). There was a subplot about the Lord of the Dead trying to marry Eurydice that just didn't work at all. But the music that fills the air when Orpheus first arrives in the land of the dead was the cheesiest possible piano ballad, accompanied by sparkling falling paper, and that was the perfect choice as far as I'm concerned.


What I've Finished Reading

Malcolm Bradley's The History Man begins with a party and a desparate gesture and ends with a different party and a desperate gesture, and in between there is not so much a plot as a series of snide brushstrokes. A sociology tutor in a large new university, Howard Kirk manufactures a lot of drama and spoils some lives and careers, throws parties, and gets no comeuppance because he doesn't have enough self-awareness. It's hard to care but easy to read - except that there was an episode at the end that was so unpleasant (to me) and so undermotivated except by the cycnicsm of the narrator, that my slightly kneejerk fun was spoiled. All the denouements are done in dismissive gestures after a timeskip. There are some funny moments and some moments where you look around and wonder what you're doing here.

What I'm Reading Now

Suggestions for Fruit Festivals

They can last for months. Pick a time when your location is having a fruit harvest. The gathering can serve as a place for group detoxification and experimenting in natural living. Exclude all use of fire, no drugs. Set up sanitation facilities. Have a brook or some other resource for bathing. Pick a date. Send out announcements. To avoid potential problems, do not advertise to the general public. Keep a loving attitude toward outsiders and the law people. The gatherings will be transition experiences in the withdrawal from civilization and the exodus into life with nature on the spiritual path. For those who decide to remain in the city, organize raw food houses. Aid one another during the dietary transition. Have weekly classes open to the public, discuss diet, crafts, zone therapy, yoga, healing and organic foods. Set up a lending library. Serve daily meals, ask for donations. [. . .]

How: 1. Find tract of land near but not on farming groves, preferably private - with or without owners o. k. 2. Rules - no fire - no drugs - no underaged runaways. Must be warm part of the year. 3. No need to contact legal authorities or officials as long as public is not invited. A public event can be staged in a local town park one day at the end of the gathering if desired.


I'm reading The New Age Directory Holistic Health Directory, a circa 1978 reference by dull-eyed beard-bearer Viktoras Kulvinskas (pictured on the back with his plants and looking none too trustworthy), primarily because I didn't want to be out all day with nothing but Gravity's Rainbow. I'm giving GR my all, but I am really starting to hate it. I'm sure it doesn't deserve all my hate; I've just reached a point of saturation at which any new petty annoyance clangs like twenty bells, for no logical reason. We've just been introduced to a character called "Scorpia Mossmoon" and I found myself making an involuntary gagging sound because it's only page 42 and I'm already sick of Thomas Pynchon's wacky names.

The New Age Directory is mildly fascinating, heavily driven by Viktoras' interests ("live foods," frutarianism, natural healing) but covering a wide range of vaguely new-agey enterprises and how to contact them (in 1978).

What I Plan to Read Next

Some books I got from the library yesterday for 99 Novels: Staying On by Paul Scott, Farewell Companions by James Plunkett, and Life in the West by Brian Aldiss.

Profile

evelyn_b: (Default)
evelyn_b

April 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526 27282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 05:25 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios