evelyn_b: (Default)
The End of the Rainbow

I finished Gravity's Rainbow on Monday night, over a couple of glasses of wine. The last thirty pages would have been breathtaking, if I hadn't been so exhausted by the first 850. Oh, well!

What I've Finished Reading

Dawn, first book in a series of (so far) beautifully upsetting tentacle tales by Octavia Butler. The people of Earth went and destroyed the world like they always seem to do, and a handful of survivors are put into suspended animation by a group of painfully earnest sapioculturists who are going to use the humans to enrich their own genetic diversity, and give them back their planet, more or less, in return. The catch is that they've controlled human fertility so that now the humans can only have part-alien children with alien assistance. Lilith, formerly of Earth, tries to resist for a while but there's only so much resisting to be done. The Oankali, the alien savior/captors, call what they're doing a Trade (with capital letters) and are convinced it's a biological imperative that they can't help; the humans feel rather that they're being tamed, and resent it without much efficacy.

What I'm Reading Now

I was hugely disappointed in the Library's section on Chinese Literature. The editorial essay by Robert K. Douglas can't refrain from ruminating about the virtues and defects of "the Chinese mind." National minds are one of the running themes of the anthology and of 1902 in general, to be fair, but here the editor's ideas seem to have prevented him from making any effort at all. He frets about the defects of Chinese poetry and dismisses all of Chinese fiction as creaky wooden morality tales that no Westerner could possibly enjoy, but provides no examples: instead, the entire literature selection following the essay consists of four pages of "selected maxims" because the editor thinks that "the Chinese mind" does maxims that much better than it does anything else. By contrast, [Ancient] Egyptian Literature gets over 120 pages of multiple genres of writing in multiple eras. Japanese Literature is not quite as long, but includes novel excerpts, drama, and several kinds of poetry. For the most part, I've been pleasantly surprised by the Library's attempt to cast a wide net - this laziness is maybe not totally unexpected, but still an unfortunate exception to the rule.

Finally finishing Gravity's Rainbow means I get to reward myself with William Dean Howells' My Literary Passions, the simple story of a man who loves books and would be delighted to tell you about some of the books he has loved in his life. I got it from the library yesterday and took it to the arboretum to read a couple of chapters next to a giant oak tree. Then, when it got too dark to read, I went inside and read a couple more. It's even pleasanter than I expected.

I shall try not to use authority, however, and I do not expect to speak here of all my reading, whether it has been much or little, but only of those books, or of those authors that I have felt a genuine passion for. I have known such passions at every period of my life, but it is mainly of the loves of my youth that I shall write, and I shall write all the more frankly because my own youth now seems to me rather more alien than that of any other person


I've barely begun The Mosquito Coast, one of four remaining 99 Novels but it, too, has been love at first sight. On the very first page there's a wary child narrator and a mad dad who took his kids out of school and keeps yelling about how he's THE LAST MAN because the toxic combination of civiization and (especially) Japanese electronics are killing all the brute virtues, oh dear. And there are woodcuts! It's nice to open a book and feel happy and excited to be reading it, instead of concrete-overshod and obscurely crawled-on.

What I Plan to Read Next

I'd completely forgotten, until it arrived at my door on Friday, that I'd pre-ordered Blood Heir by Amelie Wen Zhao, back when Zhao was for some reason getting bombarded by negative reviews all beginning "I haven't read this book, but. . ." So now I've got this big pseudo-Russian-looking YA fantasy book on my hands. Will it be good? Will it be bad? I'll probably find out reasonably soon.

There is also plenty more deeply uncomfortable tentacle action coming my way from Octavia Butler.
evelyn_b: (Default)
How can you still be reading Gravity's Rainbow? Haven't you finished it yet?

No. I am on page 620 of 887 as of this posting.

Other people like Gravity's Rainbow just fine, don't they?

Other people love Gravity's Rainbow. thedoubtfulguest shared this piece by Gerald Howard alongside several other writers, all of whom have had the thrilling experience of liking Gravity's Rainbow, who are able to describe it with love and understanding, and who compare it, with justice, to some books that I loved. There is interesting publishing history here as well as criticism. These Pynchon fans are smart people who are good at reading books and writing about them. I encourage you to go and read them now instead of listening to me whine.

I call them the Rainbros. It's not meant to be dismissive. I envy them their happiness.

So what's wrong with you, then? Why do you just keep staring helplessly at this masterpiece of 20th Century lit like someone left a dead rat with a ribbon on it under your Christmas tree?

I don't know! Because he was he, because I was I, man. It's just one of those things.

Are you just a prude who only ever wants books to be nice?

Deep down, probably, though I try to rein in that tendency when I can. Here I've been less successful than usual. I definitely resented having to read the chapter in which Slothrop has sex with a twelve-year-old three times over, first to figure out if it was maybe actually a dream (no luck), and then to get the full import of the admittedly beautiful closing paragraphs. I also resented that after approx. 3727 pages, I still didn't care about Slothrop enough to be angry or disappointed or dismayed by this choice of his. The frictionless chrome forgettability of every single character in this cast of thousands is probably part of the point (one reviewer suggests that I have misunderstood the book by "thinking about characters when [I] should be laughing at grotesques"); the selfish misuse of children by adults definitely is. I also slightly resent my total inability to care about these points as presented by Gravity's Rainbow.

So are the Rainbros all liars? Is this book actually garbage?

No, they're telling the truth. It's ambitious, polymathic, fearlessly strange and meticuously constructed. There are gems in this dream-sewer. That doesn't mean I have to like it.

Can you provide an example of the writing style?

Of course! Please be aware that the "writing style" of Gravity's Rainbow is always shifting and this example may not be representative. It does, however, have plenty of songs.

Final assembly went on in Stollen 41 )

Isn't it time to admit you're just bad at reading?

Yes, but being bad at reading hasn't prevented me from enjoying many other books. I even enjoyed parts of Giles Goat-Boy, an almost totally inexcusable waste of my time! The Rainbow is a special case, and that's why I'm admitting defeat. I mean, I'm still going to read the last 200+ pages, but the dream of somehow coming to appreciate it has been thanked for its time and released Marie Kondo-style into the universe. Maybe in ten years I'll try again.

Would you rather still be reading Giles Goat-Boy right now? Be honest.

No, not even Thomas Pynchon can make me wish I were still reading Giles Goat-Boy. But I do find myself thinking longingly of blank walls I might be staring at instead.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

A couple of 99 Novels that didn't leave a tremendous impression - Staying On is a very mildly comic blunderabout featuring saddish ex-Raj retirees who are about to get kicked out of their hotel, and their friends and acquintances. It was a little livelier than Life in the West, which I read all of very quickly in about the same frame of mind as I've heard stressed-out tech journalists describe the experience of reading Twitter: a half-bored, half-fixated twilight hunger. Not that I thought it was a bad book; I just got into that bag-of-chips airport mindset very early on and never managed to read it any other way. An ex-spy documentarian has trouble with his wife and feelings about human history. There's a lot of hanging around in hotels and lively perfunctory sex and smoking. It was all right, but I can't think of a single person I'd recommend it to - probably because I read it too fast, to be honest.

I am doing these books, which I mostly enjoyed, a disservice by dashing a handful of careless words over them, and probably doing another kind of disservice by squandering buckets of text on how much I don't get Gravity's Rainbow. Maybe I'm feeling more impatient than usual because. . .


It's The Final Countdown

There are now only NINE books remaining of the original 99 Novels. Should I slow down and take them one by one? Probably!

The Final Nine:
Gravity's Rainbow -- Thomas Pynchon
The Doctor's Wife -- Brian Moore
Dubin's Lives -- Bernard Malamud
Riddley Walker -- Russell Hoban
Darconville's Cat -- Alexander Theroux
The Mosquito Coast -- Paul Theroux
Creation -- Gore Vidal
The Rebel Angels -- Robertson Davies
Ancient Evenings -- Norman Mailer

I'm going to miss this beautiful list (even if I don't miss Gravity's Rainbow).


What I'm Reading Now

Gravity's Rainbow, natch! (as Pynchon and the Rainbros would say - "natch," like "sez," is one of the Pynchster's creaky gonzo voice tics). I've just read back up to about the point I left off - the famous Gross British Candies Set Piece, in which Tyrone Slothrop, the American with the mysteriously prophetic erections, is force-fed a bunch of disgusting British candies by his girlfriend of the moment and her landlady. This sequence is a massive clattering verbal contraption that looks a little like it ought to be hilarious but isn't quite. Actually, some of the candies presented for my horrified amusement sound nice. I'd eat a wine jelly right now if I had one.

Anyway, as Marie Kondo says (or "sez"), all books come into our lives to teach us something. The lesson being slowly doled out by Gravity's Rainbow may be that you can't love every book, or even feel mildly entertained by every book, no matter how much you want to. Some books come into our lives to teach us that some doors stay closed.

What I Plan to Read Next

Three new 99 Novels from the library, making up 1/3 of the total remaining! Riddley Walker, The Doctor's Wife, and Dubin's Lives. They are all of them not Gravity's Rainbow and I'm looking forward to reading them. I also picked up a poetry book called You Are Not Stendhal, which has nothing to do with anything, but I saw the title and immediately thought "YOU DON'T KNOW ME" and therefore had to take it home. I have to admit that the author does have me pegged in one very specific respect.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I Watched Instead of Reading

Last Friday, I went to see a play at the local university. The play was called Eurydice and purports to be a Eurydice-focused retelling of the Orpheus myth, though in fact it gives more time to Eurydice's dead dad, "one of the few among the dead who can still read and write." He writes letters to his daughter when she's still alive, and when she dies he re-teaches her to read and regales her with stories from his own memories. He makes her a room out of string because the dead don't get their own rooms. When Eurydice leaves to go back to the land of the living with Orpheus (a goofy idiot savant who looks like David Tennant's Doctor), her dad is so sad that he goes and soaks himself properly in the Lethe and lays himself down to drip forlornly off the edge of the stage. Then Eurydice comes back and can't get her dad to recognize her, so she does the same thing. Then Orpheus shows up, presumably having been killed by entitled fans after trying to release a mopey album of silences, and he doesn't remember anything, either. The end! For the curtain call, they turn up wrapped in bathrobes, which was a nice touch. I always enjoy seeing a live play and this one was no exception. It felt very unfinished, in spite of a lot of nice moments, and poor Eurydice in particular never really got to be much of a character (though to be fair, she did die very young). There was a subplot about the Lord of the Dead trying to marry Eurydice that just didn't work at all. But the music that fills the air when Orpheus first arrives in the land of the dead was the cheesiest possible piano ballad, accompanied by sparkling falling paper, and that was the perfect choice as far as I'm concerned.


What I've Finished Reading

Malcolm Bradley's The History Man begins with a party and a desparate gesture and ends with a different party and a desperate gesture, and in between there is not so much a plot as a series of snide brushstrokes. A sociology tutor in a large new university, Howard Kirk manufactures a lot of drama and spoils some lives and careers, throws parties, and gets no comeuppance because he doesn't have enough self-awareness. It's hard to care but easy to read - except that there was an episode at the end that was so unpleasant (to me) and so undermotivated except by the cycnicsm of the narrator, that my slightly kneejerk fun was spoiled. All the denouements are done in dismissive gestures after a timeskip. There are some funny moments and some moments where you look around and wonder what you're doing here.

What I'm Reading Now

Suggestions for Fruit Festivals

They can last for months. Pick a time when your location is having a fruit harvest. The gathering can serve as a place for group detoxification and experimenting in natural living. Exclude all use of fire, no drugs. Set up sanitation facilities. Have a brook or some other resource for bathing. Pick a date. Send out announcements. To avoid potential problems, do not advertise to the general public. Keep a loving attitude toward outsiders and the law people. The gatherings will be transition experiences in the withdrawal from civilization and the exodus into life with nature on the spiritual path. For those who decide to remain in the city, organize raw food houses. Aid one another during the dietary transition. Have weekly classes open to the public, discuss diet, crafts, zone therapy, yoga, healing and organic foods. Set up a lending library. Serve daily meals, ask for donations. [. . .]

How: 1. Find tract of land near but not on farming groves, preferably private - with or without owners o. k. 2. Rules - no fire - no drugs - no underaged runaways. Must be warm part of the year. 3. No need to contact legal authorities or officials as long as public is not invited. A public event can be staged in a local town park one day at the end of the gathering if desired.


I'm reading The New Age Directory Holistic Health Directory, a circa 1978 reference by dull-eyed beard-bearer Viktoras Kulvinskas (pictured on the back with his plants and looking none too trustworthy), primarily because I didn't want to be out all day with nothing but Gravity's Rainbow. I'm giving GR my all, but I am really starting to hate it. I'm sure it doesn't deserve all my hate; I've just reached a point of saturation at which any new petty annoyance clangs like twenty bells, for no logical reason. We've just been introduced to a character called "Scorpia Mossmoon" and I found myself making an involuntary gagging sound because it's only page 42 and I'm already sick of Thomas Pynchon's wacky names.

The New Age Directory is mildly fascinating, heavily driven by Viktoras' interests ("live foods," frutarianism, natural healing) but covering a wide range of vaguely new-agey enterprises and how to contact them (in 1978).

What I Plan to Read Next

Some books I got from the library yesterday for 99 Novels: Staying On by Paul Scott, Farewell Companions by James Plunkett, and Life in the West by Brian Aldiss.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

Near the end of Courting Anna, I found myself checking the remaining pages and wondering how on earth they were going to arrange things so that Anna and her charming ex-outlaw were going to end up together. There were so few pages left at one point that I began to worry that I was reading some kind of genre-bending romance in which learning to love yourself is the greatest love of all. But I was a fool to doubt; Courting Anna isn't that kind of book at all, and the ending is perfectly satisfying. I wouldn't mind reading a sequel.

Lanark was fantastic and I finished it in just a few days; I was probably a little propelled by my disappointment in Gravity's Rainbow because Lanark provides the cynical twentieth-century hellscape goodness I was hoping for with none of the accompanying realtime discomfort of getting my jaws stuck together in the overzealous taffy of Thomas Pynchon's prose. Lanark is, according to its subtitle, "a life in four books;" it begins with Book Three in a confusing subterranean city where people keep disappearing and/or turning into reptiles or slugs, and follows Lanark through a cannibalistic NHS facility to an oracle who helpfully fills him in on his beforelife as a melancholy Portrait of the Artist as a Sad Young Masturbator. Later, back in the underworld, he manages to get an audience with his very unhelpful author (in a chapter called "Epilogue" that is followed by chapters called "Climax," "Catastrophe," and "End." Like Goethe's Faust, though not quite as much, this is a book that took a long time to write, so Lanark is constantly having to walk through timeless zones that age him unpredictably, missing his son's childhood, and losing what little context he had in the first place. Alasdair Gray's publishers tried to get him to publish it as two separate books, the fantasy hellscape in one and the regular sadscape in the other, but he insisted on jamming them together and I'm glad he did. It jars beautifully.

Sweet Dreams by Michael Frayn went by in less a day, but it has the excuse that it's extremely short and has no chapter breaks. It's also an oddly apt companion to Lanark: a perky satirical heaven where everyone is doing their level best to be extremely well-meaning about the whole suffering and death thing and that's got to count for something, doesn't it?

The Paying Guests is a nicely paced crime novel by Sarah Waters that is good right up til the end, where it fizzled out a little (for me; I don't know how it'll play for others). This one had a blurb from NPR calling it "one of the most sensual [novels] you will ever read, and all without sacrificing either good taste or a 'G' rating." I don't know about good taste, but feel I should warn you that this novel does not qualify for a G rating, and that the NPR critic would have to have skimmed about a hundred pages very rapidly in order to think it did.

A Journey to Ohio in 1810 as Recorded by Margaret Van Horn Dwight is not one of the 99 Novels, but a journal of about forty pages by the twenty-year-old Dwight, first published in 1912 and reprinted in the 90s to give it an ISBN. It's wonderfully lively and funny, full of complaints and prejudiced descriptions of rustics and bad roads.

What I'm Reading Now

Since I've been thoroughly refreshed by Lanark and all the other books that aren't Gravity's Rainbow it's time to try again with Gravity's Rainbow. I decided to start over at the beginning. I'm going much slower and reading out loud when it gets extra dense, and so far I don't love it but I don't hate it yet, either.

What I Plan to Read Next

The History Man by Malcolm Bradbury (for 99 Novels), probably something else.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I'm No Longer Reading for the Time Being

Last night I was at the bar, complaining about Gravity's Rainbow, and one of my friends said something like, "You know, you can always stop reading a book" -- a true statement about books and one of their most underrated virtues. I tried to explain about the 99 Novels and how I only had twelve left to go and if I made it through 100% of Henry Williamson's Hitler Phase and the egregious slow-mo mudpit merry-go-round that was Giles Goat-Boy then I CERTAINLY was not going to be defeated by Thomas Pynchon, a novelist whom many people actually like! But then I thought about it for a minute and decided that Gravity's Rainbow and I had gotten off on the wrong foot, and the best thing to do was to put it on the shelf for a week or so, read some other things, and try again later. So Gravity's Rainbow has been temporarily replaced by Lanark on my "currently reading" shelf.

What I've Finished Reading

Sophie's Choice was so different from what I expected that I couldn't hate it even if I hated it, which I didn't. It's about the young William Styron (he goes by "Stingo," a boarding-school nickname, for purposes of fictionalization, but beyond that there is no attempt to differentiate him from William Styron, except that one of them is a novelist character in a novel and the other is just a novelist) is fascinated by/in love with his neighbor at the boardinghouse, Sophie, and her brilliant but dangerously unstable boyfriend Nathan, and for a little while they become an inseparable group, going to the beach together and feeding Stingo's imagination with story ideas and dreams of lust. Most of the time, Nathan is exhausting but friendly, but sometimes he becomes violently abusive and irrational. During these episodes, Stingo takes Sophie under his wing, gets her drunk, and hears the true story of her life, which is constantly under revision as if she were - get it? a character in the process of being invented by Stingo. This impression is strengthened by the improbable level of detail indulged in every time there is a blowjob in the story.

In the end, soon after Sophie has revealed or had imagined upon her the whole messy story of her time at Auschwitz, and Stingo's novelistic instinct or possibly real life has forced her into a series of more and more unbearable moral dilemmas, Sophie and Nathan are corralled by the power of revision into a dismal cliche of an ending worthy of our ultra-callow aspiring novelist narrator (or possibly real life, which also runs to annoying cliches). This frees Stingo to muse on the damnable difficulty of it all and to write several books. He reports a resolution made in his diary: "Someday I'll understand Auschwitz," but of course he is never going to understand Auschwitz; he is barely ever going to understand his own horniness, which he is much better at writing about.

In addition to this famous book, there are at least six other books called Sophie's Choice. Most of them are romance or erotica, but one is about a little dog who longs to see the world beyond her backyard.

What I'm Reading Now

My brother sent me an unsolicited biography of Leonardo da Vinci (by Walter Isaacson) along with Sophie's Choice and Gravity's Rainbow - it's ok so far! Physically, it's an odd book, with thick glossy pages (probably chosen for the sake of all the color reproductions), and the author has Opinions About Genius. But so far it's highly relaxing.

Also relaxing is Courting Anna, a historical mystery by Cate Simon about a female lawyer in 1880s Montana who gets mixed up with a charming outlaw. There's not a tremendous amount of tension (though there is a very brief murder mystery!) but it wears its research well and manages to acknowledge both the limitations and the unexpected possibilities of the past without being preachy. And a likable romance hero is a golden rarity for me - I'm sure I've just been reading the wrong books, but there you go. This is the right book. Jeremiah and his partner/best friend from orphanage days are both delightful in a low-key way, and I'm happy to root for them in all their endeavors.


What I Plan to Read Next

Lanark! It's not Gravity's Rainbow, so I'm looking forward to it enormously.
evelyn_b: (Default)
Reading Wednesday is in a bit of a rut since I haven't had much time to read in the past couple of weeks, and what time I've had has been dominated by Thomas Pynchon.

What I've Finished Reading

I did get a brief break from Gravity's Rainbow when I borrowed the latest Most Comfortable Man in London mystery, The Vanishing Man - a perfectly inoffensive collection of gentle infodumps and stacks of toast. A duke's undistinguished painting is stolen, Finch-Lenox muses on the history of and proper modes of address for the British peerage, Jane (whom Finch-Lenox fans will know as the future Mrs. Detective) is happily married to a conveniently absent non-character and keeps trying to set Lenox up with her friends; Lenox babysits a little terror and starts yearning for fatherhood, and we all look on benevolently from the future.

I do slightly resent Charles Finch-Lenox for wringing the maximum drama possible out of his low-key characters and then IMMEDIATELY copping out with a series of prequels. Young Lenox is ok (and Graham gets some excellent moments), and I understand it can be hard to write your way back to a cozy equilibrium after you've shaken things up, but I hope we're not stuck in the prequellands for the rest of the series. I miss Team Comfortable.

What I'm Reading Now

Unfortunately, a Finch-Lenox mystery, with its generous margins, large print and short chapters, can only last so long, and then it's back to the irony mines with Thomas Pynchon. Since I hated The Crying of Lot 49 when I read it in college, I guess I was hoping my Pynchon experience would be another Blue Highways or Norman Mailer situation, where my eyes would be opened and I would realize that I loved something I had been reflexively dissing for decades. So far, it hasn't happened. This is a book that requires a tremendous amount of attention. Reading it is like crawling through a thicket of blackberry bushes in the dark. Sometimes you get blackberries, but not very many. Sometimes you hit a clearing and sometimes you hit a wall. There's one impressively bizarre scene in which a guy drops his harmonica down the toilet in a public men's room and dives in after it, somehow wriggling his way through the pipes and wandering through the sewers, nodding to familiar turds - and that's what reading this book feels like at its worst: a herculean effort to enter an inaccessible space in which, after hours in the dark, you may see some shit you recognize.

It's very tiring. I'm not allergic to paying attention. I don't need to understand every single sentence in a book in order to be able to say, "I read that book." But it's tiring. Maybe I'm just distracted and when my schedule is back on track, I'll feel differently. Maybe not.

I started Sophie's Choice - a little further along in the 99 Novels - because I have to give it back to my brother in October and I have no faith in my ability to finish Gravity's Rainbow in time to go in sequence. This is one of the few books on the list I was dreading, but so far it's ok? The grimness and Nazis I was promised have not yet made an appearance. The narrator is a wonderfully self-centered jackass who works in publishing and wants to be a writer - surprise, surprise! He wants you to know that he's aware of how callow and arrogant he was when he wrote them, but he ALSO wants to regale you with his "clever" rejections of various manuscripts. He'd also like to make sure you hear about his sexual fantasies regarding the nice-looking woman next door, which mingle freely with his fantasies of chatting with famous authors. I'm charmed.

What I Plan to Read Next

Who can say? I feel like I'll be stuck in Pynchopolis for a long time.
evelyn_b: (Default)
So late that it's Thursday! Oh, well.

What I've Finished Reading

Kristin Lavransdatter! I think on the whole I loved it. Cut in case osprey_archer is still reading ) It was tougher than I expected, but I'm no longer sure what I expected.

I was wary of The French Lieutenant's Woman at first because the opening chapter lays it on very thick with the self-aware Victorian scene-setting. I thought, "Oh no, here comes another heaping helping of the author's cleverness." But it grew on me very quickly and so much that I was pulling it out of my bag to read at crosswalks. It is clever and so relentlessly self-aware that it was impossible (even for me, an inveterate sobber over trash) to form an emotional connection to any of the characters. At one point the author flips a coin to determine the course of the plot at a crucial moment, and in the very last chapter he steps onto the scene and turns back his watch in order to replace a guardedly happy ending with a sadder one. Still, I had a good time and resented nothing. I don't know if I'll remember anything about it in three months, but it was highly readable while it lasted. This book also features deliberately bad poetry written by the author on behalf of a protagonist, one of my favorite simple pleasures.

What I'm Reading Now

I just started Gravity's Rainbow, which arrived in the mail the other day. The mass-market paperback edition is VERY EXCITED about Gravity's Rainbow, which is "The most important work of fiction yet produced by any living writer," according to the front cover. That's a lot of blurb to live up to! I'm not sure yet where it's going but there will certainly be lots of wacky details along the way (also bombs and acronyms).

What I Plan to Read Next

Still Lanark, eventually - and I don't know how I got a copy of The Paying Guests by Sarah Waters, but apparently I have one, so I'll probably read it.

Profile

evelyn_b: (Default)
evelyn_b

April 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526 27282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 06:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios