evelyn_b: (Default)
So late that it's Thursday! Oh, well.

What I've Finished Reading

Kristin Lavransdatter! I think on the whole I loved it. Cut in case osprey_archer is still reading ) It was tougher than I expected, but I'm no longer sure what I expected.

I was wary of The French Lieutenant's Woman at first because the opening chapter lays it on very thick with the self-aware Victorian scene-setting. I thought, "Oh no, here comes another heaping helping of the author's cleverness." But it grew on me very quickly and so much that I was pulling it out of my bag to read at crosswalks. It is clever and so relentlessly self-aware that it was impossible (even for me, an inveterate sobber over trash) to form an emotional connection to any of the characters. At one point the author flips a coin to determine the course of the plot at a crucial moment, and in the very last chapter he steps onto the scene and turns back his watch in order to replace a guardedly happy ending with a sadder one. Still, I had a good time and resented nothing. I don't know if I'll remember anything about it in three months, but it was highly readable while it lasted. This book also features deliberately bad poetry written by the author on behalf of a protagonist, one of my favorite simple pleasures.

What I'm Reading Now

I just started Gravity's Rainbow, which arrived in the mail the other day. The mass-market paperback edition is VERY EXCITED about Gravity's Rainbow, which is "The most important work of fiction yet produced by any living writer," according to the front cover. That's a lot of blurb to live up to! I'm not sure yet where it's going but there will certainly be lots of wacky details along the way (also bombs and acronyms).

What I Plan to Read Next

Still Lanark, eventually - and I don't know how I got a copy of The Paying Guests by Sarah Waters, but apparently I have one, so I'll probably read it.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

How To Save Your Own Life by Erica Jong is the first 99 Novels selection that made me suspect Burgess of being condescendingly inclusive. I changed my mind later - I don't think that's Burgess' style, for one thing - but I did think it for a minute, however bad that makes me look.

Jong had a megahit in the mid-Seventies with a dishy feminist novel about women's sexual fantasies called Fear of Flying, which I haven't read. In this book, a writer named Isadora Wing has just had a megahit with a dishy feminist novel about female sexual fantasies starring her alter ego, Candida Wong. In addition to thinking about being a writer a lot, Isadora has loads of boring affairs with different aspects of the late-70s yuppie social scene to help her decide if she should break up with her icy psychaitrist husband Bennett, makes fun of said scene, takes part in an unsatisfying but not absolutely soul-crushing orgy, and gets taken to Hollywood and the cleaners by an energetic parasite. Eventually she meets the love of (the next three years of) her life and writes a bunch of goopy love poems about all the great sex they have and how good they are together. Burgess appreciates that the novel ends with 22 pages of poems; I failed to reach that peak of magnanimity. Jong writes directly and with striking clarity about sex, and with an endlessly chattering jargony flatness about everything else, which makes for some interestingly awkward transitions.

While I suspect I would have liked at least the first two hundred pages of Giles Goat-Boy a little better if I'd read it in 1966, this book gives the opposite impression: that I'm reading it a little more fondly now than I could have when it was contemporary. I kept drifting up out of my own annoyance to look down and think, "Well, it was a place and a time,"- which I guess makes me the true Condescending Includer after all. I didn't laugh nearly as much as I was supposed to, but there was one line I liked a lot: Isadora decides to go to Hollywood and sell out because "I had already tried most of the other cliches and found them wanting."

Also:

Our popular magazines reflect the same lack of sustained interest and attention. Short stories and articles abound. Magazines with the largest circulations rarely print stories more than two or three pages in length [. . .] One popular magazine with a circulation of more than 2,000,000 a week announces at the head of each story the time in which the average person can read it. For example: "Reading time: 15 minutes, 52 seconds."


Introduction to Problems in American Culture is an absolutely delightful high school sociology textbook from 1931, written by Harold Rugg. Things Harold Rugg likes include: Carl Sandberg, leading questions, the city manager system, The Advancement of Women, the word "progressive," thinking before you vote, immigrant assimilation, educational radio, trying as hard as you can to stay calm about robots stealing our jobs, and Stalin's First Five-Year Plan. There's a whole section about economic downturns in US history to illustrate how things always pick right back up again! so don't worry! and it made me sad because the economic downturn was going to last longer than he thought. Nothing turned out exactly the way Rugg hoped it would, but how could it? This is an incredibly detailed snapshot of a dynamic present, and also (in spite of Rugg's always-abundant love for leading questions) a pretty good textbook. In the first chapter, three teenagers talk about their political affiliations and try to tease out how their different beliefs have been formed. It sets the tone for an optimistic book that is often even-handed and thought-provoking, and nearly always a little more of those things than you expect. I almost said "always," but the unfootnoted Stalin cheerleading is a major exception. Luckily, that comes only at the very end, which you'd probably have to skip anyway due to unscheduled snow days or teacher layoffs, or half the class dropping out to work in a cracker factory as soon as it opens. It was the threshhold of the future, but that won't pay the bills.

Unfortunately, this was supposed to be a "read it and move it along" book, but I loved it so much that it's still on my shelf. Eventually my love will cool and I'll be able to pass it on to a new home.

What I'm Reading Now

The "you" of the Sonnets has been getting a little Alcibiadean:

try not to burn yourself on all that hotness )

. . . and in Kristin Lavransdatter, Erlend has buggered off to his mountain fastness to sulk like the straight-backed and silver-haired man-sized baby he is, and other things I won't spoil for [personal profile] osprey_archer if she hasn't gotten there yet. I'll just say that if you guess sad and frustrating, you won't guess wrong. I'm still loving this massive slow burn of interwoven irreversible choices and the wildernesses they seed. It's definitely Sigrid Undset's fault that I spent all of How To Save Your Own Life thinking, "But I love unhappy marriages; why am I still bored?"

What I Plan to Read Next

I skipped ahead a little in the 99 Novels sequence with How to Save Your Own Life (1977) and I might skip ahead again to Lanark (1981), since I already have it sitting around. I also have a non-99 non-novel called Modern News Reporting, also from the early 30s, with the most 30s bookplate I've ever seen. You can see it here if you want to: The revolution will not be novelized )

Nearly all the printing has rubbed off of Modern News Reporting's tan cover, making it look like someone's nostalgic watercolor of a book, but that doesn't mean it's not just as modern as ever inside.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

Burgess thinks The Image Men is good satire. I don't know if it is or not because I ran out of patience about 2/3 of the way through. I respect his point about how critics should relax more and not scorn to appreciate big rambling hunks of entertainment with lots of characters and side-currents, but I wound up not appreciating this one. It just keeps lurching around from one episode to the next while the Image Men bilk people but-not-really, drink giant gins, and make speeches. Did you know than in an age of images, people will believe a lot of nonsense about images? It might have made a good ninety-minute movie, but instead it was a book and I got sick of it two hundred pages from the end. This proves that literature is dead, images are the unacknowledged legislators of my brain, and I owe J.B. Priestley $5.

I also finished Giles Goat-Boy, for all the good it did me. Did the entire raised-by-goats idea come about so that John Barth could have the Goat-Boy say, while devouring a valuable religious scroll in a library for important Hero's Journey reasons, that he is "only browsing"? Probably. It's that kind of book.

Cocksure is a fast-moving, rancid, reckless piss-sprinkler of a novel flinging bile-filled condoms in every direction, which made it a welcome break from both of the above. There are a lot of pieces - a Canadian WASP whose friends are all convinced he's Jewish and trying to hide it, an immortal "Star Maker" who turns out to have literally built several stars from scratch Victor Frankenstein-style, a series of publicity-minded murders, a sexually progressive elementary school that puts on a production of "Philosophy in the Bedroom," an ingenue who obeys the rules of screenwriting in all things (in a real-life emergency, she ignores several empty phone booths in favor of the more dramatic one already in use) - all abundantly nasty or eerie or both. None of the pieces ever quite merges with the others to form the coherent shambling abomination you might be hoping for.

What I'm Reading Now

The sixties may come and the sixties may go, but arguably tolerable marriages spring eternal. Kristin Lavransdatter is still fifty acres of thorns in a twenty-acre freehold. I've just finished the second volume, The Wife, and started on the third, The Cross. Kristin and Erlend have just lost their one really good friend, Simon, and are realizing how isolated they've become since Erlend's ill-advised foray into political conspiracy. Meanwhile, time keeps turning their baby boys into teenagers and there's nothing they can do about it.

In my May 1892 issue of Harpers, I found this poem by William Sharp: The Three Infinities )


From a mathematical standpoint I'm pretty sure all of these things are technically finite (please correct me if I'm wrong), but that's beside the point.

Meanwhile, Will S. knows his sonnets are stale but you can't make him stop: That every word doth almost tell my name )

Maybe novelty is the TRUE staleness, have you thought of that?

What I Plan to Read Next

I asked my brother to send me a few books from his giant collection of slightly musty paperbacks - all 99 novels that are coming up in the sequence, including Gravity's Rainbow and The French Lieutenant's Woman - so when I actually read those will depend on his laziness instead of mine.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

I actually finished Ashlin and Olivia on the plane several weeks ago - better late than never? It's a "second-chance" love story between two young women who are so young that their "second chance" comes when they are college sophomores (the first chance was when they were all-consuming middle-school best friends for a year before having a painful falling out). cut for spoilers just in case you like your romances suspenseful )

The big draw here is the characters and their conversations - Aster Glenn Gray has a real gift for, and a willingness to indulge in, earnest, funny, meandering conversations between likeable characters. Ashlin and Olivia have passionate, youthful, totally believable opinions on art and movies, The Patriarchy and fanworks, and it's a pleasure to listen to them spitball and pontificate, both as highly invested thirteen-year-olds and as young adults in Europe. Gray is as unfettered as any actual thirteen-year-old by notions of What Kids Really Talk Like - her conversations always feel like they were based on conversations and not on other books, but not to the the point that you can't follow them.


What I'm Reading Now

Shakespeare's sonnets, all of them from the beginning. You probably knew that one of the major themes of the collection is "Golden youth, have some damn babies; your mom wants grandkids!" but did you know HOW MUCH?

give it a rest mom i'm almost forty )

Eventually the message shifts, but there's A LOT of this in the beginning.

I warmed briefly to Giles Goat-Boy when the Goat-Boy sat down to an entire uni-verse parody of Oedipus Rex in heroic couplets, and later, even more briefly when the hypertext tape machine showed up, but mostly it's been the same old ironically racist American Hollywood Literature Archetypes cleverness slog and plenty of it. On the plus side, it's written so as to have a mild forward motion even as I think I'm completely out of patience with it, like a very slow amusement park boat ride.

The Image Men is a regular novel about some con men who start an Institute of Social Imagistics at a brand-new redbrick university, and it's much more fun, though it too is getting a little bogged down and repetitive. Pavane takes place in an alt-history 1968, where technology and social development has been arrested and warped by a powerful Catholic Church since the assassination of Elizabeth I in 1588. It's richly imagined even if it's not always totally convincing, and Keith Roberts is having a ton of fun describing the hard but high calling of the semaphore operators' guild. I wouldn't be shocked out of my mind if I found out Terry Pratchett had never read it, but I would be pretty surprised.

And I finally got back on the Kirstin Lavransdatter train: Cut for Kristin Lavransdatter ) It's a good book about how damned uncomfortable everything is all the time. Maybe being a 14th-century Norwegian makes it a little better, maybe a little worse - on the evidence of this book, it's hard to say.

What I Plan to Read Next

I still have a medium-sized stack of books left over from my trip, and one more 99 Novels book out from the library - Cocksure by Mordecai Richler - plus I keep "accidentally" picking up New Yorkers from the free shelf because I like the covers. Coming soon, if I get my act together: some scans? That's a big if.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

Humbolt's Gift is easy to summarize in a sentence (washed-up ex-wunderkind bequeaths to his embarrassingly successful but rapidly money-hemorrhaging friend the nutty movie scenario they cooked up together one drunken night when they were both still young and golden), but hard to describe. The reasons why Charlie Citrine, the embarassingly successful writer-narrator, is hemorrhaging money form several tide pools of comically demoralizing drama, each with its own thriving drama ecosystem. Bellow combines beautifully sturdy paragraphs, the elite athletes of the paragraph world, with meandering, unwieldy plots - a perfect combination if you're me.

Black Spring continues to be a weird-ass book of uncertain category (Wikipedia calls it a novel, which I guess is fair enough), with lots of quasi-Joycean stand-up-comic logic and an eccentric blend of Real Gross Nasty True Life Grittiness and pure fantasy. Sometimes he hits a splendid ranty stride, and for a moment you're nodding along as if to music, and then suddenly he'll skid off in another direction about the true nature of mankind or something, and you can almost hear the record scratch inside your head.

If you want to listen to Henry Miller reading HIS OWN WORDS in exactly the voice you would expect him to have (a pleasantly crusty midcentury New Yorker with some distinctive vocal tics,) there's loads of audio over on Ubuweb Sound: http://www.ubu.com/sound/miller.html - also thanks to Wikipedia.

What I'm Reading Now

I really can't tell if The Coup is a failed experiment that's slowly growing on me or a successful one I'm not keen on. Updike's put on the extra-florid costume of a fictional African dictator (who once studied in Wisconsin) in order to make Updikean jabs at American consumerism and cultural imperialism from a fresh angle, and giving himself an excuse to be maximally indulgent in his prose style, with more decorative curlicues than suburban Pennsylvania allows. It's lushly satirical but seldom actually funny, at least for me, as the work of macheteing through the metaphors is too tiring. Do I like it? I still don't know.

In Kristin Lavransdattar I've just finished Chapter 5 of Book II (The Wife), and. . . Erlend did something considerate! Can you believe it? Of course he did plenty of inconsiderate things before then and probably after, but check it out:

Erlend's Big Moment )
This book keeps getting better, but I suspect the marriage of Kristin and Erlend will get a little worse.


What I Plan to Read Next

I've given myself too much of a backlog, so beyond the 99 Novels, I'm not sure. The two that I ordered haven't arrived yet, but I have a couple more from the library: Man of the People by Chinua Achebe and The Mandelbaum Gate by Muriel Spark.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

OH MAN you guys. I couldn't remember a thing about why I hated Hatchet before I started reading it, but as soon as I did, it all came crashing back like a needy ghost on the ghost of a motorcycle. It's the writing style. Or, as Gary Paulsen would have it, The Style.

The Style.
The Style. )

It's not bad. You can read it in a day. The author seems to have some bones to pick with the alienation of man from his environment by technology and civilization. I can't share in this lament because I need my glasses to read it.

I didn't love Station Eleven. In fact, I almost put it down forever when I saw the "reveal" about the identity of the boring creepy survivalist prophet heading toward me in the distance - but it was close enough to the end that I decided to keep going. I don't regret finishing it, but I also don't feel that I got much more out of seeing all the loose ribbons tied up than I would have from leaving them untied, or from spending the same amount of time re-reading an old favorite or staring at a blank wall. That doesn't make this a bad book. Sometimes when I read a book that doesn't "click" with me I put it down to being a bad reader, but I don't think that's the case here. As Marie Kondo might say, some books come into your life to teach you to read a sample before buying.

What I'm Reading Now

I took some books back to the library and picked up three. It was supposed to be just one, but I couldn't remember if Humbolt's Gift or Herzog was the other Saul Bellow book on the 99 Novels list. The third book was an unrelated title that caught my eye as I was looking for Saul Bellow.

Humbolt's Gift is an almost ludicrously easy book for me to love - being a highly digressive Troubled Artist Retrospective narrated by a successful but incredibly hapless writer about and around his dead, difficult poet friend - and I'm sorry to say that as soon as I started reading it, I started neglecting all my other books - Black Spring and The Coup and The Canterbury Tales and all the rest of them. Even Kristin Lavransdatter, to some extent.

However, I'm still making progress in Kristin Lavransdatter, though I think I missed a couple of nights through allowing myself "one more chapter" of Bellow.

1396 Bonnie and Clyde )


What I'm Not Reading In Favor of the Trashy TV Version

We've been trying to catch up on Game of Thrones so I can watch the finale in real time. This means Dragons Every Night for the past week or so - we've just started Season 7. I'm relived that Spoilers ahoy! )

I'm enjoying it a lot, is what I'm trying to say here. The writing has gotten noticeably worse in some respects, but I don't mind. I'm looking forward to catching up and to a maximally dramatic final season.

What I Plan to Read Next

Once Humbolt's Gift stops demanding all my time and attention, there's the other book I got from the library: When Found Make A Verse of by Helen Bevington. Apparently, it's poems! After that, I'm not sure. I decided to go ahead and order the missing 99 Novels from 1964, so those should be arriving soon.
evelyn_b: (Default)
Sketchy and sloppy, but technically on time this week!

What I've Finished Reading

Two re-reads: The Adman in the Parlor by Ellen Gruber Garvey and Doing Literary Business by Susan Coultrap-McQuin - both studies of gender and culture in the mid-to-late 19th century that I was keeping around for the details and the bibliography.

Also Tuck Everlasting, a beautiful middle-grade story about a girl who stumbles upon a family of accidental immortals - another one that I saw a bunch at the Scholastic Book Fair but never wanted to read. Unlike The Girl With the Silver Eyes, this is a book I can recommend to everyone without hesitation - it'll only take about 90 minutes to read, if that, and is worth sitting with even if you don't come to the same conclusions as Winnie.

What I'm Reading Now

I've just started Station Eleven, which I've been meaning to read since it came out - I bought it a month ago and then immediately regretted my choice, for reasons that still aren't clear to me. It's fine so far - a deadly flu has hit Toronto and we know from the back of the book that we'll be alternating between a post-apocalyptic story and a mid-or pre-apocalyptic one. I think my subconscious was trying to tell me that I didn't really want to read a post-apocalyptic story just now, but oh well, here we are.

Henry Miller is an unexpectedly enjoyable chatterbox. I'm not even sure what to call Black Spring, with its alternating reminisces of Brooklyn and stream-of-consciousness fugues on the sublimity of taking a nice long piss and manic dorm-room philosophy that is SUPPOSED to be hard to follow, because clearly constructed paragraphs are the opiate of the midlist, WAKE UP AMERICA. I guess it's a blog. Unlike most books, this is one I'm glad I didn't attempt to read thirty years ago; I would have been constitutionally incapable of appreciating this gabby Gus at any point before 2015.

Over the weekend I visited a very imperfectly organized, ashtray-smelling small-town bookstore and came home with books. One of them is The Coup by John Updike - since I have to wait on the next 99 Novels in sequence, I decided to give this one a try. The Coup is another tale of fictional post-independence Africa, narrated by the fictional ex-dictator of a fictional country, with loads of made-up names that are probably allusions to something. It's very different in style from A Bend in the River, very self-consciously exotic. It's too early to tell if I'll like it or not.

Since last week's post was late, there's not much new to report on Kristin Lavransdatter. Kristin is making bad choices; her parents are worried and upset but trying to be kind; Erlend quietly continues to be the worst.

What I Plan to Read Next

One of the books I bought from the ashtray-smelling bookstore was Hatchet by Gary Paulsen, a book I hated in middle school with a burning unquenchable hatred, and which I'm eager to read again. The last reread of something I hated in school was Blue Highways by William Least Heat-Moon, and that turned out not only enjoyable in itself, but a major forgotten source of inspiration for practically everything I wrote during the period in which I was writing things. I'm curious about what Hatchet will turn out to be.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

Late Call by Angus Wilson. I was a little worried about this 99 Novels selection because Wilson's The Old Men at the Zoo was one of the few 99 Novels that left me cold - but I liked this one a lot. The satire is much more down to earth, and kinder - it's about an old woman retiring to live with her son in a postwar New Town, with her difficult, charming, poisonously bitter old husband and his resentments, and her son's resentments and his grown-up children's, and all her own memories crowded together in a modern house with intimidatingly self-sufficient stove and washing machine.

I mentioned Frankenstein last week, and my thoughts on it are not deep nor have they changed much: Victor Frankenstein is a world-class idiot who can bring life to lifeless matter through science! and decides that the best use of this incredible new technology is OBVIOUSLY "build a guy from scratch!" but apparently never counted on having to make any other decisions with regard to his shambling emo teen creation. As soon as the creature opens his earnest, innocent, love-seeking eyes, Victor runs off to have a nervous breakdown about how (totally unexpectedly!) hideous his creature turned out to be. Victor, maybe you should have prepared for this moment by building a slightly larger than average frog first? Or something? He also can't figure out that "see you on your wedding night, sucker!!" might constitute a threat to anyone but himself, even though the monster has just painstakingly explained that his vengeance M.O. is "kill everyone Victor cares about." He decides that this threat means that the creature is going to kill him on his wedding night, and then it'll all be over! So obviously he has to get married as soon as possible so his fiance will be safe forever! Victor is the stupidest mad scientist.

Victor's creature is an instant classic and I love him. He gets carelessly knocked into life by a total doofus and has to fend for himself, a stranger and afraid in a world he never made, and damn it, he does the best he can. Anyone whose introduction to human emotion is The Sorrows of Young Werther is bound to experience some social difficulties, even setting aside the whole "giant reanimated corpse patchwork" aspect of things. Ok, so you shouldn't kill innocent people, even if you have a legitimate beef with your creator and are feeling legitimately betrayed by humanity. But it's hard not to feel for him just the same. Is he the grandfather of all sad monsters? I don't know enough about sad monster history to be sure, but he's a memorable one.

I feel like I must have read Frankenstein at some point, possibly in high school when I read a lot of things I forgot immediately after. At least, I experienced a lot of deja vu while reading - which might just be free-floating Frankenstein cultural osmosis. I wasn't keeping a reading log back then so there's no way to know for sure.

What I'm Reading Now

I'm in the middle of U.P. by R.A. Riekki, which is a fantastic book about scrubby angry-bored inchoate-longing-addled teenage boys in the late-eighties Upper Penninsula of Michigan, and just picked up Black Spring by Henry Miller (a used bookstore acquisition driven by my pledge to finally read Henry Miller) whose first chapter about growing up in Brooklyn dovetails perfectly with the concerns of U.P. in spite of vast distances in time and space and degree of urbanization:

The boys you worshipped when you first came down into the street remain with you all your life. They are the only real heroes. Napoleon, Lenin, Capone -- all fiction. Napoleon is nothing to me in comparison with Eddie Carney, who gave me my first black eye [. . . ] All these boys of the Fourteenth Ward have a flavor about them still. They were not invented or imagined: they were real. Their names ring out like gold coins -- Tom Fowler, Jim Buckley, Matt Owen, Rob Ramsay, Harry Martin, Johnny Dunne, to say nothing of Eddie Carney or the great Lester Reardon. Why, even now when I say Johnny Paul the names of the saints leave a bad taste in my mouth. Johnny Paul was the living Odyssey of the Fourteenth Ward; that he later became a truck driver is an irrelevant fact.


I'm also reading The Spire by William Golding, about a bunch of medieval sinners building a cathedral to no avail - actually re-reading, because William Golding is too damn subtle for me; I got halfway through and realized I had missed 9/10 of the innuendos.

Also, Kristin Lavransdatter! under the cut )

What I Plan to Read Next

I'm going out of town this weekend, and as usual when I go out of town I get ambitious and pack a lot of books, thinking I'll have more free time than I do. This time I've got ten. One of them is Kristin Lavransdatter. Tuck Everlasting and Light in August are in the pile along with some reference-y books about the past, and The Canterbury Tales. We'll see what I end up reading.

Sadly, neither The Defence by V. Nabokov nor Heartland by Wilson Harris are available at the local library, so I'll either have to buy them or ILL it if I want to continue my 99 Novels in chronological order.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

Last week I forgot to mention An Error of Judgment by Pamela Hansford Johnson, the last 99 Novels selection for 1962. Johnson is, as the About the Author on the back page informs me, the wife of my perfectly acceptable non-nemesis, C.P. Snow - and An Error of Judgment is constructed a lot like one of Snow's lawyer-memoirs: doggedly sensible literate narrator, loosely interwoven personal and professional concerns with a fateful choice at the center, plenty of earnest conversations and monologues. But it's significantly weirder, a little more lively, and a lot more memorable than anything in the Snowverse. I don't know if ultimately the plot "works" - there's something a little artificial about the way the doctor manuvers himself into the set-piece of his crime - but it was certainly a ride and I was glad to take it.

Just A Normal Marriage is the Harlequin novel by Leigh Michaels that I got out of the free books box down the street. I enjoyed 90% of it even though the business of getting Shauna and Rob into a marriage of convenience was pretty strained. The plot: her narcissistic socialite mother is happy to give wealthy Shauna custody of her young half-sister, but only if Shauna is married! Rob is a friendly pediatrician who is concerned about the half-sister's future. Shauna offers to pay his student loans - if he marries her for a year! I also didn't see the point of making Shauna a twenty-six-year-old virgin, or of half the misunderstandings, and Rob's reaction when he thinks Shauna has fallen into the arms of her toolish ex-fiance (when it's actually attempted rape! Rob, what good are you if you can't just ask what happened?) is unworthy of an otherwise good dude. But all of that is no harm done (and [personal profile] thisbluespirit, I will be sure to add the summary to Unconventional Courtship so it can be livened up with Dalek Sec and others).

There is also Faust, technically a play, by my best new genius friend J.W. Goethe. Faust is nuts. It's magnificently nuts. It starts with a heartbreaking prologue about finishing a book at eighty that you started in youth (which is what happened with Faust) and rolls right into a hilarious second prologue that is a lively discussion among a director, a clown, and an actor about what should go into a play. Then it's time for a board meeting in heaven between God and the Devil about whether the devil can go ahead and try tempting that one guy (God says go ahead because otherwise there wouldn't be a story). Then there's an Easter party in the streets of Universitytowne and the Devil sneaks into Faust's house in the shape of a poodle, and it's all downhill, and uphill, and downhill and back up again from there. The translator's note keeps comparing it to Ulysses, so I spent the whole thing thinking about how apt a comparison that is: it's an obsessively sprawling, wry, wacky, incorrigible human circus. Unlike Ulysses, it is almost entirely written in rhyme.

(It's "technically" a play because it's written as one, but I am skeptical about its stageability, though I guess stranger things have happened).

Before I read Faust, the only thing I knew about Faust (Goethe version) was that in the end, Mephisto loses track of Faust's soul because he's too busy lusting after a pack of boyish angels to drag it to hell properly. I am happy to report that I was not misled, and this is in fact what happens.

What I'm Reading Now

Advertisements for Myself by Norman Mailer - which hasn't aged that well and most of whose component pieces aren't that great (Mailer keeps saying things like "As you can see if you're not an idiot, this essay I wrote/freshman creative writing story/dumb joke for a friend is pure garbage and you're a sucker if you thought it was any good, but it would be criminally dishonest of me not to include it in this Advertisement for Myself since I did write it after all" and then you read it and wish you were reading a less genre-breaking iconoclastic hammerpiece where selection is made on more traditional grounds) but which I still kind of like because I can't help liking Mailer. There's this one piece that's just Mailer handing out bitchy backhanded compliments to every author of roughly his own age whom anyone ever compared him to, and my heart just goes out to him - just flaps clumsily out to him like a scruffy maternal goose. And this going-out of my heart, with attendant feeling that Mailer and I are brittle, self-protecting sisters under the skin, is its own back-handed compliment, all the sadder for being directed sixty years after the fact at someone who will never read it. Clearly one of us is rubber, and one of us is glue.

Also, Frankensten! It's great. Victor Frankenstein is an idiot. It's also much more of a Romantic travelogue than I expected. More on this next week.

Kristin Lavransdatter )

What I Plan to Read Next

One night when I was drunkenly describing the plot of Faust to some guys, one of them said that Thomas Mann, author of The Magic Mountain, had also written a Faust. So maybe I'll read that? There are also a couple of 99 Novels from the library, The Spire by William Golding and Late Call by Angus Wilson.

Profile

evelyn_b: (Default)
evelyn_b

April 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526 27282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 09:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios