evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

Last week I forgot to mention An Error of Judgment by Pamela Hansford Johnson, the last 99 Novels selection for 1962. Johnson is, as the About the Author on the back page informs me, the wife of my perfectly acceptable non-nemesis, C.P. Snow - and An Error of Judgment is constructed a lot like one of Snow's lawyer-memoirs: doggedly sensible literate narrator, loosely interwoven personal and professional concerns with a fateful choice at the center, plenty of earnest conversations and monologues. But it's significantly weirder, a little more lively, and a lot more memorable than anything in the Snowverse. I don't know if ultimately the plot "works" - there's something a little artificial about the way the doctor manuvers himself into the set-piece of his crime - but it was certainly a ride and I was glad to take it.

Just A Normal Marriage is the Harlequin novel by Leigh Michaels that I got out of the free books box down the street. I enjoyed 90% of it even though the business of getting Shauna and Rob into a marriage of convenience was pretty strained. The plot: her narcissistic socialite mother is happy to give wealthy Shauna custody of her young half-sister, but only if Shauna is married! Rob is a friendly pediatrician who is concerned about the half-sister's future. Shauna offers to pay his student loans - if he marries her for a year! I also didn't see the point of making Shauna a twenty-six-year-old virgin, or of half the misunderstandings, and Rob's reaction when he thinks Shauna has fallen into the arms of her toolish ex-fiance (when it's actually attempted rape! Rob, what good are you if you can't just ask what happened?) is unworthy of an otherwise good dude. But all of that is no harm done (and [personal profile] thisbluespirit, I will be sure to add the summary to Unconventional Courtship so it can be livened up with Dalek Sec and others).

There is also Faust, technically a play, by my best new genius friend J.W. Goethe. Faust is nuts. It's magnificently nuts. It starts with a heartbreaking prologue about finishing a book at eighty that you started in youth (which is what happened with Faust) and rolls right into a hilarious second prologue that is a lively discussion among a director, a clown, and an actor about what should go into a play. Then it's time for a board meeting in heaven between God and the Devil about whether the devil can go ahead and try tempting that one guy (God says go ahead because otherwise there wouldn't be a story). Then there's an Easter party in the streets of Universitytowne and the Devil sneaks into Faust's house in the shape of a poodle, and it's all downhill, and uphill, and downhill and back up again from there. The translator's note keeps comparing it to Ulysses, so I spent the whole thing thinking about how apt a comparison that is: it's an obsessively sprawling, wry, wacky, incorrigible human circus. Unlike Ulysses, it is almost entirely written in rhyme.

(It's "technically" a play because it's written as one, but I am skeptical about its stageability, though I guess stranger things have happened).

Before I read Faust, the only thing I knew about Faust (Goethe version) was that in the end, Mephisto loses track of Faust's soul because he's too busy lusting after a pack of boyish angels to drag it to hell properly. I am happy to report that I was not misled, and this is in fact what happens.

What I'm Reading Now

Advertisements for Myself by Norman Mailer - which hasn't aged that well and most of whose component pieces aren't that great (Mailer keeps saying things like "As you can see if you're not an idiot, this essay I wrote/freshman creative writing story/dumb joke for a friend is pure garbage and you're a sucker if you thought it was any good, but it would be criminally dishonest of me not to include it in this Advertisement for Myself since I did write it after all" and then you read it and wish you were reading a less genre-breaking iconoclastic hammerpiece where selection is made on more traditional grounds) but which I still kind of like because I can't help liking Mailer. There's this one piece that's just Mailer handing out bitchy backhanded compliments to every author of roughly his own age whom anyone ever compared him to, and my heart just goes out to him - just flaps clumsily out to him like a scruffy maternal goose. And this going-out of my heart, with attendant feeling that Mailer and I are brittle, self-protecting sisters under the skin, is its own back-handed compliment, all the sadder for being directed sixty years after the fact at someone who will never read it. Clearly one of us is rubber, and one of us is glue.

Also, Frankensten! It's great. Victor Frankenstein is an idiot. It's also much more of a Romantic travelogue than I expected. More on this next week.

Kristin Lavransdatter )

What I Plan to Read Next

One night when I was drunkenly describing the plot of Faust to some guys, one of them said that Thomas Mann, author of The Magic Mountain, had also written a Faust. So maybe I'll read that? There are also a couple of 99 Novels from the library, The Spire by William Golding and Late Call by Angus Wilson.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

Yes, dear Lotte, I shall arrange and order everything; give me as many things to do as you like, and as often as possible. One thing, though: if I might ask you not to use sand to dry the notes you write me. . . ? Today I raised it hastily to my lips, and was left a gritty crunching in my teeth.


I needed a break from Phil Maddison's semi-coherent crankiness, so I read THE BEST POSSIBLE BOOK for that purpose and also, as befits its role as a Chronicle of Ancient Sunlight antidote, one of the shortest non-picture books I have ever read. It's called The Sorrows of Young Werther and it's the sad tale of an adorable doofus who never reckoned on having to live in an imperfect world when his skin and his summer days have always been perfect heretofore. I mean, he knows there's such a thing as the inherent tragedy of all life, because it gets name-checked in all his favorite songs, but no one told him it would hurt this much!!

The plot is very simple. Thackeray put it best:

Werther had a love for Charlotte. . . )

If it's wrong to receive a story about a promising young dude who idiotically talks himself into shooting himself with his beloved Charlotte's own pistols, ostensibly to "make her life easier," as a hilariously delightful breath of golden springtime, well. . . at least I'm not the first? Werther's crazy emo charm is real, and so is Charlotte's very human equanimity. She's not heartless, and she likes Werther - but life has its way of going on. This story was based partly on a real suicide, partly on Goethe's own hopeless crush on a married friend, and uses the best parts of pity and wry self-awareness.

"We shall see each other again!" I cried. "We shall find each other, we shall pick each other out from among the many. I am going," I continued, "going of my own free will, yet if I thought we were parting for ever I could not bear it. Farewell, Lotte! Farewell, Albert! We shall meet again."
—"Tomorrow, I expect," she countered in jest.


<3

What I'm Reading Now

I didn't give up on the Chronicle, of course! A Solitary War and Lucifer Before Sunrise are both perfectly tolerable 90% of the time, though Henry Williamson seems to have more or less given up on the ensemble cast - as Phil gets crankier and more frustrated, the people in his life fade into catchphrases and cardboard antagonists and one or two pairs of beseeching feminine eyes. The scope of narrative sympathy narrows along with Phil's own. Phil is exhausted trying to live his ideal of honest farm work, whose perfectly predictable failure he is far too inclined to blame on everyone else's decadence. His neighbors spread rumors about him being a German spy, some of which are unfair and some of which he might try to counter by not trying to get other people to listen to his favorite Hitler speeches quite so often. He frets about someday getting the time to sit down and write his generation's War and Peace, and maybe out here beyond the book we're supposed to realize that he has! but it's not enough just being as big a crank as Tolstoy; War and Peace gets its power from its soapiness, and HW is committed to making his narrative as repetitive and nearly joyless as Phil's true experiences of running a farm and failing to write a novel because he's too tired from running the farm. I added that "nearly" because every now and then there is some joy, usually in the form of some grass or a bat or the feeling of being awake at night in an inexpressibly complex living world. HW's nature writing was always his strong point, even back before he developed all these weak points.

There is also Emma Dunning Banks's Original Recitations With Lesson-Talks, an 1896 handbook for the elocution student or dedicated amateur. It's exactly what it says: 54 monologues chosen for their popularity as recitations (as opposed to their literary merit, the introduction is quick to point out - too many budding elecutionists pick their favorite poems only to have them sink like stones because they're too delicate or specific for general audiences) with stanza-by-stanza instructions on how to get the best performance out of each. It's a fascinating look at a lost world.

What I Plan to Read Next

That's the real question! [personal profile] osprey_archer posted about C.S. Lewis' book An Experiment in Criticism a few days ago, so when I was in the library looking for something else, I saw it and took it home. Maybe that! Almost certainly more Phil, until the Phil runs out. Maybe cats who solve mysteries?

Profile

evelyn_b: (Default)
evelyn_b

April 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526 27282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 09:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios