evelyn_b: (Default)
Where, though? It's a good question.

What I've Finished Reading

About three-fourths of the way through A Double Life, a wonderful thing happens. With a completely straight face, the author J. Michael Lennon appears at a party, in the third person, as "J. Michael Lennon, a young professor at the University of Illinois." Maybe it's not that wonderful, but I laughed and laughed. This shout-out to Mailer's "third-person personal" is all the funnier for being apparently egoless. Lennon appears a few times throughout the rest of the book, with no attention called to the fact that he is The Author of the Book You Hold In Your Hands, Dear Reader.

I enjoyed it a lot, though my fondness for Mailer is pretty abstract. Eventually I'll read his novels about Jesus and Hitler, though probably not Harlot's Ghost (the 1,100-page CIA novel that ends with the words TO BE CONTINUED). I followed with detached amusement his not-very-deft attempts to feud with Michiko Kakutani and be a Hollywood Intellectual. I didn't find his claims to totally genuinely 100% love all women as convincing as Balzac's. There is one really sad and nerve-wracking story in here, and that's the year Mailer tries to engineer a writing and party-going career for his paroled prison correspondent, Jack Abbot.

Mailer on Mailer in The Spooky Art:
Writers aren't taken seriously anymore, and a large part of the blame must go to the writers of my generation, most certainly including myself. We haven't written the books that should have been written. We've spent too much time exploring ourselves. We haven't done the imaginative work that could have helped define America, and as a result, our average citizen does not grow in self-understanding. We just expand all over the place, and this spread is about as attractive as collapsed and flabby dough on a stainless steel table.

You can always count on Mailer to give too much credit to himself even when he's trying to be self-critical.

What I'm Reading Now

If I'd picked up To Shape the Dark at a bookstore or library instead of ordering it, I might have balked at its multiple fancy fonts and slightly irritating introduction and put it straight back on the shelf. I would have missed out - not necessarily on a masterpiece, but on a thoroughly enjoyable anthology of sci-fi short stories about scientists. Editor Athena Andreadis congratulates her authors on having avoided the "as you know, Bob" style of writing, but they mostly haven't at all. I'm surprised at how soothing I find these fresh buckets of exposition being dumped over me one after another.

Favorite story so far: "Fieldwork" by Shariann Lewitt, about a geologist whose grandmother died trying to colonize Europa. That's the other, more obviously soothing thing about sci-fi: the illusion of a future. It's terribly cozy to think anyone could have a grandmother who colonized Europa.

What I Plan to Read Next

The Woman in the Water, a Most Comfortable Man in London prequel about A Deadly Serial Killer, arrived yesterday. I've been sort of sighing resignedly in its direction.
evelyn_b: (killer dolphin)
I'm posting this one a little early, because I'm about to embark on a mad quest to witness a thing going in front of another thing in South Carolina. Traffic might be bad. Wish me luck!

What I've Finished Reading

“When did you stop pitching on me as the murderer?” the murderer asks Poirot near the end of Death in the Air That’s when he learns that of course Poirot never did stop. He knows it’s true, but he’s still offended. No one likes to be seen through.

Don’t trust anyone who [spoiler!wants to help you solve a murder]; that’s the obvious lesson here.

One of the best things about Death in the Air is that it contains a proto-Ariadne Oliver, just one year before the introduction of Ariadne Oliver in Cards on the Table

”Yes, a private investigator like my Wilbraham Rice. The public have taken strongly to Wilbraham Rice. He bites his nails and eats a lot of bananas. I don’t know why I made him bite his nails, to start with; it’s really rather disgusting, but there it is. He started by biting his nails and now he has to do it in every single book. So monotonous. The bananas aren’t so bad; you get a lot of fun out of them – criminals slipping on the skin. I eat bananas myself- that’s what put it into my head. But I don’t bite my nails. . .”


The Toys of Death cheats a little, if you consider long confessional letters cheating, but it's a perfectly good mystery, with a stylishly complicated murder method and a pleasantly loathsome victim - here, a selfish novelist who cultivates relationships in order to gather material for his books and drops them when he's done.

There were three other novellas in Women Sleuths, which I read with diminishing enjoyment. Mignon Eberhart's The Calico Dog was about two young men, both claiming to be the kidnapped son of a wealthy widow. The Book That Squealed by Cornell Woolrich was about a librarian who stumbles on a crime, and is so full of cheesy movie cliches that I couldn't tell if it was supposed to be a parody or not - Miss Roberts, for example, is plain and unremarkable in her everyday getup, but transforms into a knockout when she takes off her glasses - the transformation is so acute that the detective who has been ignoring her for twenty minutes suddenly begins to stammer and asks her to a "picture show." The final story is a much later production about sad clowns and contains a two-page infodump about the history of clowning. Overall, I'm happy to have been introduced to the Coles, but equally happy to give this collection a new home in the free books box.

What I'm Reading Now

The ABC Murders by Agatha Christie. This is a re-read, so I know that [Spoiler! the apparently killer POV chapters aren’t really], but I don’t at all remember what the solution was. There are some references to future and past cases, probably a mix of intentional and unintentional repetition. Poirot describes the plot of Cards on the Table to Hastings, as an example of a tricky crime, and a stock victim description used ironically in Death in the Air (“She was a bright, happy girl with no men friends,”) is mocked here, too. I like this one a lot – a skillfully woven rug of suspense that will be skillfully pulled out from under me (even if I can’t remember exactly how).

There's nothing wrong so far with One Man Show by Michael Innes, but I don't understand why Avon Classic Crime Collection chose to market it as a bloodcurdling thriller. Maybe it turns into one later, but it's pretty arch and leisurely so far. Scotland Yard inspector John Appleby, who apart from having a corpse fall on him got next to no characterization in The Ampersand Papers, is here allowed to be skeptical of Modern Art. Also, an artist was found shot! Was he murdered? Probably!

What I Plan to Read Next

Murder in Mesopotamia!
evelyn_b: (killer dolphin)
What I've Finished Reading

Unfinished Portrait is the second murder-free novel published by Christie under the pen name Mary Westmacott, and it's much better than Giant's Bread. Maybe it's just that the weaknesses don't show as much, since Unfinished Portrait is the story of a hapless young twentieth-century housewife/aspiring writer rather than that of a hapless young musical genius with amnesia. The melodrama hits closer to home. In fact, all signs point to this being a Portrait of the Artist as a Young Self-Saboteur. The emotional, imaginative Celia throws over a handful of admirers to marry a golf-minded nonentity who gives her a daughter she can't understand; the nonentity leaves her for another woman and gets huffy when she expects him to handle the divorce business himself (at the time, divorce required proof of infidelity, and he was too chivalrous to "put Marjorie through it"). Celia is just about to throw herself off a cliff when she meets The Narrator of this Book, a former portrait painter who can no longer paint (because of The War) but who is so touched by her story that he wrote this book, an unfinished portrait in words. If anyone I didn't already know was Agatha Christie had tried to pull the bit of Significant Imagery she does with the painter's hands, I think I would have cringed hard enough to sprain something, but Christie is cringe-proof and always will be.

What I'm Reading Now

Women Sleuths is a Mount TBR selection, one of the books I took home before the used bookstore shut down and haven't opened since. It's a Reader's Digest anthology of four novellas, beginning with The Toys of Death by notable Golden Age of Murder weirdos Margaret and G. D. H. Cole, a Fabian couple who co-wrote 35 mystery novels. The copyright page of Women Sleuths claims that The Toys of Death was published in 1939; Wikipedia says 1948. I'm interested to read a socialist murder mystery from the Golden Age milieu. So far, there are no very noticeable differences. A house party has been planned, and the Marpleish mother of a well-known detective has just embarrassed the pompous host by accidentally correcting the geography in his fanciful story about Catalonia. Now she's in the garden, making unflattering observations about the guests. What could be better?

What I Plan to Read Next

Next in Christie is Death in the Air, a novel involving both Hercule Poirot and the exciting new world of (getting murdered on) airplanes!
evelyn_b: (Default)
It's the season of lateness. Please forgive. I'll be back around for comments when I can.

What I've Finished Reading

Some of the stories in Chicks in Chainmail are still witty and fun, but the main source of enjoyment for me was as a window into the recent past. It has something of the same feeling of strained currency as "Uncle Charlie's Poems," (from the 1890s) and I'm not sure what it is that makes it feel strained rather than simply of its time. There's a lot of name-dropping of Hot Topics. Names dropped include: hacking, credit cards, the foster care system, ADD, divorce settlements, working mothers, Mel Gibson as heartthrob. That's not to say I didn't enjoy it - it was very relaxing weekend reading.

Also: Chicago by Gaslight, Samuel Paynter Wilson:

"Get Busy With Emily." Isn't that a picture for you! O, you praying fathers and mothers, how many of you have witnessed the performance of this nasty, suggestive, pig-pen show? How about your Emily, Mary or Martha, who is being dragged down by these immoral shows? It should be "Get Busy with Your City Officers."

This is an insubstantial expose of "vice" in all its forms, by a member of the Douglas Neighborhood Club, circa 1910. I couldn't tell at first whether it was a parody or not, but I think it's for real, just poorly written. The story he tells about a woman who almost escapes brothel life only to be thrown back by a nastily pious employer is genuinely affecting. Wilson uses it to encourage rich women to look out for their "fallen sisters," but doesn't let it dampen his enthusiasm for turning sex workers out of doors.

It was worth skimming, but apart from a few notes - like the intriguingly DISGUSTING and OBSCENE title of this musical comedy, and some rants about chop suey palaces and ice cream parlors (some of which may have served alcoholic drinks disguised as fancy milkshakes, if that wasn't just a fever dream of Wilson), it wasn't specific enough to keep as a reference book.

Did 1910 have vanity presses? I was trying to figure out why this insubstantial and vague-yet-extremely-local screed would be printed on such unusually good paper.

What I'm Reading Now

Herself Surprised by Joyce Cary is the fictional autobiography of Sara Monday, who appears in The Horse's Mouth as the woman Gulley had such a grand time beating in the old days. There’s a little bit of a Daniel Defoe homage here, since it’s narrated by Sara in the wake of her trial for theft, sometime after she became housekeeper to one of a series of hapless older men.

“Know thyself,” the chaplain says, and it is true that I never knew myself till now.”

Yet I thought I knew myself very well, and that I was humble enough, and I remember the first time I saw myself in my true body. [. . .] It stopped me dead with the blow. I knew I was not a beauty, but till that hour I had not seen myself with the world's eye. I had made a love of my nose, snub and broad though it was, and my eyes which were nothing but brown. Are not any eyes wonderful if you will look at them alone and forget the rest?

It's good. Sara's a narrator who is doing her best to sort out the mysteries of life for her interlocutors, but she's been awfully busy this whole time and you can't expect her to put everything aside for you, a stranger, when she could barely do right by the people she loved.

What I Plan to Read Next

MAYBE A Single Man and a glorious return to the 99 Novels list? Maybe something else.
evelyn_b: (Default)
What I've Finished Reading

The Maias isn't shy about being a story made of words, or a satire of Lisbon literary layabouts. The characters – at least the male characters – are bright but not deep, and the female characters are less bright and less deep. It may also be the least gothic incest story of the nineteenth century. We have four hundred-odd pages of bubbly club talk and overeducated emotion while the incest scenario gets set up (Maria and Carlos were raised separately; Carlos thinks his sister is dead and Maria never knew that she had a brother; they meet and are amazed by how well they understand each other! They even have the same middle name, what a cute coincidence! It must be destiny!) When Ega learns the horrible truth about his friend Carlos' mistress (entirely by accident; a friend of the family who knows Maria but hasn't seen Carlos in many years notices them walking together an remarks on it in all innocence) he agonizes over whether to tell his friend, tries to burden the family steward with the information, and finally breaks the news. Carlos is horrified for about fifty pages before he breaks it off with Maria and they go their separate ways. He weeps with bitterness, and the curse of the Maias is acknowledged.

Then, in the final fifty pages of the novel, the world slides back into alignment. A decade passes, and Ega and Carlos are back at the Grémio, gossiping and self-deprecating as if nothing had happened. The horror has lasted a few months at most; the long business of wasting one’s life extends beyond it into the future. Maria has made a perfectly respectable and boring marriage; Carlos has gone back to his relatively harmless wastrel existence, Ega still hasn’t finished that atom book and isn’t going to, but he’s definitely going to buy some clothes and complain that he spends too much on clothes. So the world keeps turning under the cursed and the charmed alike. I’m not completely sure what to make of this, but I think I like it.

I'm sorry to say that I didn't love The Ladies of Missalonghi at all. I disliked it so much that I felt bad about it and went back to try to find some things that I liked. I did find some - the history of the town of Byron (named after the first poet its founder could make heads or tails of), the description of Missy's medical examination, the line drawings) - but eventually I gave up and gave in to my dislike. You can read about it here if you want to )

Maybe The Mysterious John Smith's misogyny is supposed to make him a more "realistic" character than The Blue Castle's Barney Snaith, whose only major flaws are an embarrassing writing style and a tragic inability to speak in complete sentences. But given that T.M.J.S. is also a rich mastermind who rolls into town and buys a valley just in time to be tricked into a wish-fulfillment marriage by Missy and [SPOILER! the self-hating ghost of his dead wife!!] this superficial nod toward realism seems neither necessary nor sufficient. Besides which, he's no fun. I don't at all mind reading about fictional misogynists if they are in a book about asshole artists or how much being in the army sucks, but I don't like them in my rom-coms. No snappy pillow talk about how your first wife killed herself just to ruin your life, please! And because I already had it in my mind that this book was going to be similar to The Blue Castle, I wasn't able to relax and enjoy my dislike of T. M. John Smith as I might in any number of other books. I kept waiting for the story either to abandon the template or do a better job of following it. Which is, again, totally unfair to poor Colleen McCullough, who was presumably just trying to write a book like anyone else.

I don't know. This book got me thinking about romantic comedies: how pretty much all my life I've been convinced that I love them, because I love them in theory and there are a few that are my favorites, but if you pick a rom-com at random and show it to me, I'm overwhelmingly more likely to hate it than not. Why I should have such an easily outraged Rom-Com Ideal when I have no problem enjoying mediocre sci-fi and bad murder mysteries is not clear to me.


I was disappointed in myself for not being able to enjoy this book on its own merits (or if not "enjoy," at least separate it from The Blue Castle enough so that I feel like I'm being fair), but I'm also not convinced that it's worth the effort to try again. Oh, well! Better luck next time, Australia.

What I'm Reading Now

I've started The Complete Works of Hadewijch, a present from several years ago, but I don't expect to get through it very quickly. Hadewijch is a thirteenth-century mystic whose works are letters exhorting friends to live in Christ, and poems about personal revelations - all well out of my comfort zone.

Also started: Chicks in Chainmail, a very 90s, very tongue-in-cheek comedy-fantasy anthology with a "warrior women" theme. There is a silly story about a man who dresses as a woman in order to be allowed to fight, and a silly story about the unforeseen consequences of a tax on metal bras. There is an extremely silly story about Hillary Clinton in Valhalla that made me so sad I couldn't follow what was happening, through no fault of 1994.

What I Plan to Read Next

Herself Surprised by Joyce Cary, probably some other things.
evelyn_b: (Default)
Crossposted from Livejournal

What I've Finished Reading

The Hidden Land is much more fast-paced and intense than The Secret Country, and the intensity gets a giant boost three pages from the end, with YET ANOTHER inconclusive and uncomfortable ending. Characters are a little sharper and a couple of plot elements that were total mysteries in the first book are - not so much explained here as investigated a little more efficiently. Biographical note confirms that this and The Secret Country started life as a single novel, which seems much more like their natural state (though I liked the bit that was added to fill The Hidden Land out to novel length).

Alabama writers )


What I'm Reading Now

The Hunger Games )

The Worst Journey in the World )


What I Plan to Read Next

More Hunger Games! I'm still keeping the reading to lunch breaks, so as to avoid burning straight through in a day - so it will be a little while before I finish this book. The next book is called Mockingjay CATCHING FIRE and there's no shortage of copies at my library. My library may or may not have The Whim of the Dragon, the final book in the Secret Country trilogy.

Profile

evelyn_b: (Default)
evelyn_b

April 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526 27282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 02:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios