The World is Not Enough Wednesday
Sep. 6th, 2017 12:05 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
What I’ve Finished Reading
No one’s happy by the end of Room at the Top. Joe starts an affair with a likable older woman named Alice, whom he feels comfortable talking to as a friend and whose teeth he doesn’t see as a rebuke to his own teeth. This is by contrast to the teeth of Susan, the rich girl, which are white, even, prosperous, and mocking. Joe plots to lure Susan away from her rich boyfriend and get her to marry him, which will be a stick in the eye of the British class system, which would be all very well except he doesn’t particularly enjoy her company and now he’s stuck with it. Not to mention the “necessity” of throwing over Alice, with attendant grisly tragedy and guilt.
Burgess thinks the message here is “stick with your own kind,” but maybe it’s more that everybody loses when guys treat women as class markers instead of as people? It’s hard for me to tell exactly. Joe is not a lovable character but he is a good narrator: bitter, observant, totally unsentimental, almost heroically unembarrassed.
What I’m Reading Now
Doorways in the Sand by Roger Zelazny. The narrator, Fred Cassidy, has been changing his major for thirteen years because his uncle’s will provides for him as long as he is a student, but once he receives his degree the remaining money will go to the Irish Republican Army. He also likes to climb things, so we meet him on the roof of one of the campus buildings. Thirteen years of higher learning has given Fred a healthy respect for the absurd, which may or may not serve him well once he accidentally gets mixed up in the theft of an alien artifact.
This is a weird book about weird things happening, but the snarky matter-of-fact narration makes it work in a way total seriousness wouldn’t. It’s not exactly a comedy, but sometimes it feels like a plot outlined according to the Rule of Funny, then played straight with a narrator who nevertheless sees the humor in any given situation. Fred gets attacked a lot, winds up unconscious in the Australian outback and is rescued by alien agents dressed up as local fauna. Someone is convinced he’s stolen this valuable stone, and Fred is equally convinced that he has no idea where it is. As if that’s not enough, his new advisor is threatening to graduate him come hell or high water, and the artifact business is so distracting he might actually pull it off. What then?
At one of my local coffeehouses, I found a book called The Book of Jane, a Christian chick-lit novel. It’s not stealth Christian like Can't Help Falling, where the Inspiring Message didn't rear its head until two-thirds of the way through, but it is a “witty, modern” retelling of the Book of Job. Is this wise? Is it possible? Is it to be desired? I guess we’ll find out. Jane is a PR agent living in New York, with a cute boyfriend and a non-explicitly gay best friend and an exciting new client and an unshakable faith in God. But would she be so keen on God if her life weren’t perfect??
What I Might Read Next
I went out of town and bought too many books. These will be discussed soon.
No one’s happy by the end of Room at the Top. Joe starts an affair with a likable older woman named Alice, whom he feels comfortable talking to as a friend and whose teeth he doesn’t see as a rebuke to his own teeth. This is by contrast to the teeth of Susan, the rich girl, which are white, even, prosperous, and mocking. Joe plots to lure Susan away from her rich boyfriend and get her to marry him, which will be a stick in the eye of the British class system, which would be all very well except he doesn’t particularly enjoy her company and now he’s stuck with it. Not to mention the “necessity” of throwing over Alice, with attendant grisly tragedy and guilt.
Burgess thinks the message here is “stick with your own kind,” but maybe it’s more that everybody loses when guys treat women as class markers instead of as people? It’s hard for me to tell exactly. Joe is not a lovable character but he is a good narrator: bitter, observant, totally unsentimental, almost heroically unembarrassed.
What I’m Reading Now
Doorways in the Sand by Roger Zelazny. The narrator, Fred Cassidy, has been changing his major for thirteen years because his uncle’s will provides for him as long as he is a student, but once he receives his degree the remaining money will go to the Irish Republican Army. He also likes to climb things, so we meet him on the roof of one of the campus buildings. Thirteen years of higher learning has given Fred a healthy respect for the absurd, which may or may not serve him well once he accidentally gets mixed up in the theft of an alien artifact.
This is a weird book about weird things happening, but the snarky matter-of-fact narration makes it work in a way total seriousness wouldn’t. It’s not exactly a comedy, but sometimes it feels like a plot outlined according to the Rule of Funny, then played straight with a narrator who nevertheless sees the humor in any given situation. Fred gets attacked a lot, winds up unconscious in the Australian outback and is rescued by alien agents dressed up as local fauna. Someone is convinced he’s stolen this valuable stone, and Fred is equally convinced that he has no idea where it is. As if that’s not enough, his new advisor is threatening to graduate him come hell or high water, and the artifact business is so distracting he might actually pull it off. What then?
At one of my local coffeehouses, I found a book called The Book of Jane, a Christian chick-lit novel. It’s not stealth Christian like Can't Help Falling, where the Inspiring Message didn't rear its head until two-thirds of the way through, but it is a “witty, modern” retelling of the Book of Job. Is this wise? Is it possible? Is it to be desired? I guess we’ll find out. Jane is a PR agent living in New York, with a cute boyfriend and a non-explicitly gay best friend and an exciting new client and an unshakable faith in God. But would she be so keen on God if her life weren’t perfect??
What I Might Read Next
I went out of town and bought too many books. These will be discussed soon.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-06 12:44 pm (UTC)This sounds fair from what I remember of the film and the TV series, too.
but it is a “witty, modern” retelling of the Book of Job. Is this wise? Is it possible? Is it to be desired? I guess we’ll find out.
Well, I suppose it's different, there is that! Doe she have three totally annoying Christian friends with dedicated theories yet?
no subject
Date: 2017-09-06 07:27 pm (UTC)I'd be fascinated if The Book of Jane really did go as dark as Job, but given the marketing on this book I doubt the publishers would allow it.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-06 08:13 pm (UTC)Maybe Jane has some mild difficulties, moans a lot and her friends just want to talk about their latest Christian paperback crazes? /sounds accurate.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-07 02:26 pm (UTC)Although, mind you, when I was young I had one about a girl who got run over by a bus and then evangelised her whole village successfully while she lay on her couch for a year.
That sounds amazing. How did she do it? Did everybody just go along because they didn't want to hurt her feelings after she was run over by a bus? For a second I thought you were talking about Pollyanna, but there the evangelism was for the Gospel of Glad (iirc). And not a bus (I think).
no subject
Date: 2017-09-07 05:19 pm (UTC)LOL, I don't remember the details, although I think I may still have it somewhere. (It was a Sunday School prize, and also I consider it an important historical curiosity.) As I recall, she was run over by a bus and had to lie flat for a year so she could get well. She was angry about this for a while, but they put her downstairs and left the door open so everyone in the village could waltz in whenever they choose and she found she cheered them up/converted them over time, so it was all obviously worth while. I am pretty sure she converted the bus driver, who was very sorry about it all, as well as the village bad boy, Brian. (They only had one.) Possibly a lot of the village was already at least nominally Christian.
It is terrible on so many levels from a modern pov and I think I kind of knew that even when I was ten (but I first had it when I was seven). I don't think the adults read these books; I think it was just a matter of grabbing one from the tiny selection at the Christian bookshop that was aimed at the right age and being thankful. (Unlike the US, our Christian publishing industry is tiny, and is mostly either NF or imported with the odd thing down by Hodder or Scripture Union.)
I also had a truly terrible Narnia-esque fantasy one as well. Or at least, it was enjoyably duff (I used to take it as encouraging, because I felt sure at about ten that I could write as well as the author, if possibly not correctly, unlike all the other books I read). However, it was a series of four books, and I had 2 and 3, but when you put them together with 1 and 4, the religious analogy fell apart disastrously. (If you have a Jesus-figure, you don't marry him off to somebody later!) The fourth, however, did have an army of evil penguins, which almost made up for the fact that it seemed to have entirely forgotten everything in books 1-3.
(I should say, to be fair, that there were some quite nice and thoughtful ones, but it's the terrible ones that always stand out!)
Pollyanna is great, though. I loved it. I tried to play the Glad Game - but you can see the other literature I had access to... ;-)
no subject
Date: 2017-09-11 12:38 am (UTC)the religious analogy fell apart disastrously. (If you have a Jesus-figure, you don't marry him off to somebody later!)
But what if they love each other?? Also, kids love romance subplots, right?
Do you remember the title of this evil-penguin-army-including masterpiece? It sounds magical.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-11 07:14 am (UTC)It really really wasn't at all, and I'm pretty sure as a British Christian children's series, it'd be unavailable where you are (hopefully), but I think it was called Tergan's Lair.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-11 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-12 07:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-06 02:40 pm (UTC)Can't Fred transfer to a different university?
no subject
Date: 2017-09-06 07:22 pm (UTC)Burgess is pretty good on women counting as people, I think? His selection is dude-heavy, but nearly always good, and when it's bad it's not usually because the female characters are poorly handled. The big major exception (imo) is For Whom the Bell Tolls where the love interest is awful (imo) but not necessarily worse than many of the male characters. Braine's women characters are viewed through a heavy lens of cynicism, but they do about as well as anyone can hope to under those conditions.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-07 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-11 12:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-07 12:47 am (UTC)I am not sure that a retelling of the Book of Job was ever a good idea, especially not in a witty modern version, but I'm nonetheless fascinated to hear how it turns out. It seems like it would be cheating to do it without killing off at least one person who is important to Jane, though.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-07 02:37 pm (UTC)I love the idea of a perky chick-lit romance that turns into the Book of Job, with all its horror and loss and total lack of reasonable answers intact, but the publishers of Christian chick-lit and I don't necessarily have a lot of interests in common. Probably someone's done it, or something like it, but not for the inspie market.
Jane, though? Jane's dog doesn't even die.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-08 01:50 am (UTC)Does her dog even meet with a minor misfortune or some variety? Or does it just hang around being cute and resting its head on Jane's knee so she can stroke its velvety ears as it gazes lovingly up at her in her time of troubles?
no subject
Date: 2017-09-11 12:43 am (UTC)There's also a very unappealing love interest! But that's more a trial for me than for Jane.