Wheels Within Wheels Wednesday
Sep. 27th, 2017 09:21 amWhat I've Finished Reading
It was supposed to be other things, but I got sidelined by C. S. Lewis' Space Trilogy. Do you like science fiction, but wish it had more Renaissance cosmology and random sermons about gender? The Space Trilogy isn't really science fiction so much as a very Lewisian fantasy set in space, or, in the case of That Hideous Strength, in which space is mentioned briefly toward the end. Some of the things that happen in the Space Trilogy: a mild-mannered philologist is kidnapped by uncouth public-school scientists who try to sacrifice him to some Martians, but the Martians turn out to be a harmless crew who teach him their language and take him fishing. Later, he meets some angels. The angels send him to Venus, where he has to prevent the local Adam-and-Eve equivalents from screwing it all up again. At first he tries logic and reason, but eventually has to resort to punching the Devil to death. Meanwhile, back on earth, a bunch of diabolical progressives are ruining a sleepy college town! Only one man can stop them, and that man is the resurrected Merlin (who just happens to have been buried in the college deer park).
If you like Lewis, or if you grew up with Lewis and aren't sure how you feel about him now, you should definitely give this a read. I sometimes go back and forth about how much I like Lewis, but these books made me very fond of him, as much because of as in spite of their flaws.
What I'm Reading Now
After I finished Doorways in the Sand, I burned straight through Trumps of Doom, another book by Roger "Razzle Zelazzle" Zelazny, and began but got bogged down in Nine Princes in Amber. Trumps is steeped in the same wisecracking/hard-boiled perpetual confusion as Doorways, whereas in Nine Princes most of the confusion evaporates early on and the story settles into a kind of opaque fantasy battle plot, which I'm having trouble getting into. The two books are linked: Merle, the narrator of Trumps of Doom is the son of Corwin, the narrator of Nine Princes, and both are exiled princes of the perpetually civil-warring fantasy kingdom Amber. Amber is the real world, and Earth and all the other realms are just shadows and mirrors of Amber, which is why Amber initially appears to be made up entirely of fantasy cliches. It's a great premise, but I think like it better as a background curse on hapless concussed pseudo-detectives than I like it as a setting in its own right.
What I Plan to Read Next
Still catching up!
It was supposed to be other things, but I got sidelined by C. S. Lewis' Space Trilogy. Do you like science fiction, but wish it had more Renaissance cosmology and random sermons about gender? The Space Trilogy isn't really science fiction so much as a very Lewisian fantasy set in space, or, in the case of That Hideous Strength, in which space is mentioned briefly toward the end. Some of the things that happen in the Space Trilogy: a mild-mannered philologist is kidnapped by uncouth public-school scientists who try to sacrifice him to some Martians, but the Martians turn out to be a harmless crew who teach him their language and take him fishing. Later, he meets some angels. The angels send him to Venus, where he has to prevent the local Adam-and-Eve equivalents from screwing it all up again. At first he tries logic and reason, but eventually has to resort to punching the Devil to death. Meanwhile, back on earth, a bunch of diabolical progressives are ruining a sleepy college town! Only one man can stop them, and that man is the resurrected Merlin (who just happens to have been buried in the college deer park).
If you like Lewis, or if you grew up with Lewis and aren't sure how you feel about him now, you should definitely give this a read. I sometimes go back and forth about how much I like Lewis, but these books made me very fond of him, as much because of as in spite of their flaws.
What I'm Reading Now
After I finished Doorways in the Sand, I burned straight through Trumps of Doom, another book by Roger "Razzle Zelazzle" Zelazny, and began but got bogged down in Nine Princes in Amber. Trumps is steeped in the same wisecracking/hard-boiled perpetual confusion as Doorways, whereas in Nine Princes most of the confusion evaporates early on and the story settles into a kind of opaque fantasy battle plot, which I'm having trouble getting into. The two books are linked: Merle, the narrator of Trumps of Doom is the son of Corwin, the narrator of Nine Princes, and both are exiled princes of the perpetually civil-warring fantasy kingdom Amber. Amber is the real world, and Earth and all the other realms are just shadows and mirrors of Amber, which is why Amber initially appears to be made up entirely of fantasy cliches. It's a great premise, but I think like it better as a background curse on hapless concussed pseudo-detectives than I like it as a setting in its own right.
What I Plan to Read Next
Still catching up!
no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 02:48 pm (UTC)I have read that Ransome the mild-mannered philologist was based on Tolkien, who was just hopelessly puzzled about how he should feel about that.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 04:12 pm (UTC)(by "loved" I mean . . . probably did not love).
no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 05:02 pm (UTC)And later he becomes the Fisher King and lies on a couch, radiantly young-old and perpetually bleeding from the wound he got while punching out the Devil.
Ahahaha, this is beautiful. It's like a fanfic writer who really really loves a character and therefore makes that character an EPIC WOOBIE in their fic, with tragic sad (and yet also beautiful) wounds - except it's basically RPF fic about one of the author's RL best friends who was totally hearing the story read out loud every week in Inklings meetings and, one can only presume, squirming in his chair at this description of his beatific suffering and dispensing of wisdom.
And of course Lewis is just happily reading along, convinced that this is a perfectly normal loving homage and not even noticing that it might be a bit weird for Tolkien.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-28 04:23 pm (UTC)<3
I have nothing to add except that I love everyone in this bar.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-10-01 12:03 am (UTC)I found that the Amber series really picks up around book 3 (Sign of the Unicorn), in which there is a murder mystery, and Corwin finds out that all the stuff he thought was going on in books 1 and 2 was... not the whole story. Book 2 is okay, but its first half suffers from Woman in Refrigerator.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-01 03:47 pm (UTC)I finished Nine Princes and thought it picked up a little right at the end - I liked Corwin's escape from the dungeon, because it looks like a deus ex machina but has actually been perfectly adequately prepared for by the text. I don't entirely love Zelazny's habit of ending books on a cliffhanger, but that might just be my lack of familiarity with series fantasy.
Anyway, I'll probably be reading The Guns of Avalon soon. I'm not sure where exactly the Zelazny train is taking me, but for now I'm glad I got on.
no subject
Date: 2017-10-01 04:48 pm (UTC)Interested to hear your thoughts as the series develops! The cliffhanger thing only gets worse as the series progresses, as I recall -- and it's certainly unusual for series fantasy. There's something to be said for viewing the Corwin and Merlin series each as being really a single long book published in five installments. (Starting with Corwin book 3, I read the books out of the giant 10-book omnibus, which helped.)
no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 04:37 pm (UTC)I love the discomfort of everyone involved when the resurrected fourth-century magician turns out to be totally hostile to twentieth-century values in a totally unhelpful way. This guy is supposed to save us in our time of need, but all he does is rant about the unnatural sorcery of the diaphragm? What the hell, man.
Lewis' attitude toward it is kind of ambiguous to me. He clearly thinks Jane is making a mistake by working on her mediocre John Donne dissertation instead of having babies, and this is connected somehow with her being the dupe of modern ideas, and everything's supposed to resolve itself in the end with procreation - but I also don't get the impression that Merlin is just a mouthpiece for Lewis' Thoughts on Birth Control. Certainly none of the present-day characters are willing to treat it like the disaster Merlin thinks it is. But I guess I don't really know enough about Lewis to know for sure.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-28 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-28 03:31 am (UTC)"At first, I thought this total stranger was just boring and worthless, but then I walked a mile in her shoes and all my prejudices were confirmed!" Come on, buddy. :|
no subject
Date: 2017-09-28 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 07:41 pm (UTC)Have you read Till We Have Faces? I mostly prefer Lewis's NF (as someone who came from a rather unimaginative, rigid chapel background, Lewis's allowing imagination and debate and questioning was such a huge help to me, and if I disagree with him on many things, well, he said it was fine for me to disagree with him!). Anyway, Till We Have Faces is my exception. It is a very weird book in that I like it intensely when I am reading it, and as soon as I am not, I am hard put to say exactly what happened in it and why I liked it so intensely. Every time. It was the latest of his fiction, and therefore supposed to be quite heavily influenced by his wife - maybe that is why I like it? (It is allegory, of course, but that probably goes without saying even if you haven't already read it!)
I think I would have been a lot more amused even at Perelandra and maybe even THS if I'd known he was kind of casting Tolkien as Ransome. Even back then I would have known enough to get that Tolkien would have hated it!! :lol Lewis.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 08:23 pm (UTC)I definitely can't blame anyone for hating Perelandra and THS; they are 1) a damn mess, 2) somehow both all over the place and leaden with sermondumps, and 3) a tacky parade of Lewis' largely unbeautiful prejudices + Very Important Opinions on Sex and Gender. Plus all the weird Deep England / Britons v. Saxons weirdness that I don't even understand enough to dislike properly. However, I don't hate them. I like them - THS more than Perelandra, surprisingly, because I remembered it as the most whacked-out and uncomfortably revealing of them all. It is that, but it's also plottier and has at least one interesting character, arguably two.
Even back then I would have known enough to get that Tolkien would have hated it!! :lol Lewis.
I don't know why I find Lewis' difficulty in predicting what Tolkien would and would not have hated so likable, but I do. <3 Tolkien likes Jesus right? And cool old English stuff? So obviously Tolkien would love a story in which he becomes SPACE JESUS and meets Merlin! Obviously.
Oh, and! What does it mean to be a "neo-Christian"? That's not a phrase I've heard before - or if I have, I've forgotten it.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-27 09:05 pm (UTC)I know at least one other person who has the same experience of it. It is very strange.
Oh, and! What does it mean to be a "neo-Christian"? That's not a phrase I've heard before - or if I have, I've forgotten it.
No, because it's a stupid phrase: neo means new (so neo-Nazis, neo-Classical), so it therefore supposes that Lewis was already living in some kind of post-Christian age where being a Christian therefore meant being a neo-Christian, as far as I can tell. Lewis would have been scathing, and I would have loved to have watched. (He wasn't the worst lecturer I havd, and I had him only briefly, but he was definitely on the young, smug and arrogant side at the time & as far as I can tell, that was a phrase meant to tell us that we needn't read what CS Lewis wrote about Paradise Lost except as a quaint curiosity, the "neo-Christian" pov.)
Plus all the weird Deep England / Britons v. Saxons weirdness that I don't even understand enough to dislike properly.
This stuff usually basically = Arthur. (The Matter of Britain - the rising of the Celts against the Anglo-Saxons, which is to say one day the welsh, Scottish, Cornish, Manx and Irish will totally get their revenge by magic dragon and/or returning King Arthur, if he wasn't made up/actually Danish/whatever. The Celts were here first, they want a belated Brexit from all the damned Angles, Jutes, Danes, Saxons & Normans who came in after and took over dammit. Then there would be bards and druids and magic, it would be great. Something like that, anyway. ;-p)
no subject
Date: 2017-09-28 04:49 pm (UTC)I'm glad that Lewis was a help to you! And that Joy was a help to Lewis, apparently.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-28 04:53 pm (UTC)This is probably why he's still failed to reappear.
I'm glad that Lewis was a help to you! And that Joy was a help to Lewis, apparently.
I realise he seems to have been the opposite to many people, but I suppose it depends where you're coming from at the time.